Web-Based Kitchen Appliance Control Program Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing kitchen appliances face complexity in generating and implementing control programs for automated meal preparation, which can result in inedible food or safety hazards due to faulty programming.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method running as a web application that enables the generation and implementation of a control program for kitchen appliances by inputting ingredients and processing sequences, linking them through data arrays, and compiling into a usable format for automated preparation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control programs are stored in non-volatile memory of the kitchen appliance, then the appliance can be used immediately after acquisition, but generating control programs involves great complexity and safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate usabilityVSAvoidcontrol program generation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the control program generation process from the kitchen appliance itself and relocates it to an external computer system. The appliance only receives and executes pre-generated control programs, separating the complex generation task from the simple execution task. This allows the appliance to be used immediately without having its own program generation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computer system as an intermediary between the user and the kitchen appliance for program generation. This intermediary handles the complex tasks of parsing recipes, generating control logic, and validating safety constraints, while the appliance simply executes the generated programs. This mediator approach resolves the contradiction by centralizing complexity externally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Extent of automation

If control programs are generated with full automation capability, then meal preparation is automated, but faulty programming can cause uncontrollable stirring mechanisms and safety hazards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated meal preparationVSAvoidsafety mechanism reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the computer system validates generated control programs against safety constraints before transferring them to the appliance. The system checks whether generated programs properly implement safety logic for the stirring mechanism and heating elements, providing feedback loops that prevent unsafe automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies beforehand cushioning by pre-validating and pre-testing control programs on the computer system before they are transferred to the appliance. Safety constraints are built into the generation process, cushioning against potential failures by ensuring programs are safe before execution begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Manufacturing precision

If control programs are generated manually with detailed instructions, then precision is high, but the process is time-consuming and complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol program precisionVSAvoidprogram generation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses copying by taking recipe data from existing sources (cookbooks, digital recipes) and automatically copying/translating this information into structured control programs. The system parses natural language recipes and copies the essential steps into machine-executable instructions, maintaining precision while eliminating manual programming time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual program writing with an automated computer-based system that parses recipes and generates control logic automatically. This substitution uses software intelligence to perform what would otherwise require time-consuming manual effort, achieving both precision and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10159382B2Systems and methods involving a computer system and a kitchen appliance
Publication Date: 2018.12.25 VORWERK & CO INTERHOLDING GMBH
  • US10159382B2 patent drawing
  • US10159382B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods herein relate to arrangements involving a computer system and a kitchen appliance. In one illustrative implementation, such computer system may include a data processing device on which a computer-implemented process is run as a web application, the process being designed to set up a control program for the kitchen appliance, wherein the control program enables an automated preparation of a meal via preparation instruction(s) of the kitchen appliance. Further, in some implementations, the kitchen appliance may comprise a microprocessor, a heatable stirring vessel, and a stirring mechanism located in the stirring vessel, wherein the microprocessor is set up to control the stirring mechanism and/or the heater based on the control program generated.