Kitchen Display System Segmentation for Order Type Separation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In restaurants, the mixing of in-store dining, delivery, and take-out orders in kitchen display systems leads to inefficiencies, as staff struggle to identify and manage delivery or take-out orders effectively, often resulting in overlooked or omitted orders.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that separates order displays based on type, using a processor to categorize and visually distinguish orders for in-store dining, delivery, and take-out by displaying them in distinct areas or modes, allowing for easier identification and management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If all orders (in-store dining, delivery, and take-out) are displayed together in a mixed manner on the kitchen display, then the display system maintains simplicity and unified management, but staff cannot easily identify delivery or take-out orders, leading to time loss and potential order omission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of identifying order typeVSAvoidtime to identify delivery/take-out orders
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The kitchen display system is segmented into distinct display areas: a first display area for in-store dining orders and a second display area for delivery and take-out orders. This spatial segmentation allows staff to quickly locate and identify different order types without searching through a mixed list, directly reducing identification time while maintaining comprehensive order management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If orders are displayed in a mixed manner without distinction, then the system structure remains simple, but delivery and take-out orders may be overlooked or omitted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of order managementVSAvoidcomplexity of display system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The display system is divided into functionally distinct areas: a first display area dedicated to in-store dining orders and a second display area for delivery and take-out orders. This segmentation enhances reliability by ensuring that delivery and take-out orders receive dedicated visual attention and are less likely to be overlooked, while the overall system structure remains manageable through clear spatial organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different display areas are assigned specific visual characteristics and functional roles: the first display area is optimized for in-store dining orders with appropriate visual cues, while the second display area uses distinct visual properties to highlight delivery and take-out orders. This local differentiation improves reliability by making order types immediately distinguishable without requiring complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If delivery and take-out orders are mixed with in-store dining orders in the same display area, then unified order management is maintained, but staff require additional time and effort to identify priority orders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiency in order managementVSAvoidtime and effort to identify delivery/take-out orders
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The kitchen display system implements spatial segmentation by dedicating a first display area to in-store dining orders and a second display area to delivery and take-out orders. This allows staff to immediately locate priority orders without sifting through unrelated orders, significantly improving operational efficiency and reducing the time required to identify and process delivery and take-out orders.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary classification of orders by type before display, automatically routing in-store dining orders to the first display area and delivery/take-out orders to the second display area. This preliminary sorting action occurs in the background, allowing staff to access already-organized information and improving productivity without adding manual sorting steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240104674A1Information processing apparatus, information processing system, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2024.03.28 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US20240104674A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104674A1 patent drawing
  • US20240104674A1 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an information processing apparatus has a first interface connectable to an external server, a second interface connectable to a display, and a processor. The processor is configured to receive order data for dinning orders via the first and second interface and cause the display to display order data in a first area or a second area depending on whether the order data is first-type order data or second-type order data. The first and second areas are separate areas. The first-type order data is for dining orders of a first type, such as delivery orders, and the second-type order data is for dining orders of a second type, such as in-store dining orders.