Kitchen Utensil Motion Sensing for Adaptive Cooking Hob Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intelligent kitchen utensils fail to accurately determine the position and action of the utensil during cooking, leading to inconsistent sensor readings and difficulties in interpreting food state due to lack of context awareness, especially for average cooks who struggle with manual regulation of cooking parameters.

Innovation Solution

A kitchen utensil equipped with a multi-axis accelerometer and gyroscope that assesses the context of use, combining temperature, conductivity, and spatial position data to interpret and conditionally process sensor readings, enabling the cooking hob to adapt its output based on the utensil's actions and food state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If temperature probes are used to monitor food state, then temperature information is obtained, but the ability to determine actual utensil position and action is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature measurementVSAvoidutensil position and action information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensing capabilities (temperature sensing, acceleration sensing, and orientation sensing) into a single integrated utensil system. The temperature probe incorporates both temperature sensors and motion sensors (accelerometers and gyroscopes) to simultaneously monitor food state and utensil action, eliminating the need to choose between different measurement types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The utensil is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as a temperature monitoring device and as a motion tracking device. By integrating multiple sensor types into one universal tool, the system can perform diverse functions including temperature measurement, acceleration detection, orientation detection, and cooking action recognition without requiring separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple temperature measuring points are used along the probe, then core temperature detection is improved, but the ability to detect actual probe position remains insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecore temperature detectionVSAvoidprobe position information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges temperature sensing with motion sensing in the same probe assembly. While multiple temperature sensors monitor thermal conditions at different depths, motion sensors (accelerometers and gyroscopes) simultaneously track the probe's spatial position, orientation, and movement patterns, providing comprehensive data for both temperature and position determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The motion sensors act as intermediaries that provide positional information complementary to temperature measurements. By detecting acceleration and orientation, these sensors serve as mediators that translate physical probe position into measurable data, enabling the system to correlate temperature readings with specific spatial locations and cooking actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If temperature-based determination of probe inclination is used, then orientation assessment is achieved, but results are highly disturbed by food anisotropy and heat gradient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprobe inclination determinationVSAvoidorientation measurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces thermal-based orientation determination with mechanical sensing using accelerometers and gyroscopes. These motion sensors directly measure gravitational force and rotational motion to determine probe orientation, eliminating reliance on temperature gradients that are affected by food anisotropy and heat distribution variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the measurement parameter for orientation detection from thermal parameters (temperature gradients) to mechanical parameters (acceleration and rotational velocity). This parameter substitution provides more reliable and direct orientation data that is independent of food thermal properties and heat transfer characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If manual regulation of burner power is required, then cook control is maintained, but cooking consistency deteriorates for average cooks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecook controlVSAvoidcooking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback control where sensors continuously monitor cooking parameters (temperature, motion, orientation) and this data is fed back to the cooking hob control system. The hob automatically adjusts power output based on real-time sensor data, maintaining cooking consistency without requiring manual intervention from the cook.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cooking system performs self-regulation through automated control algorithms that process sensor data and adjust heating parameters independently. The system serves itself by automatically monitoring its own state and making necessary adjustments to maintain optimal cooking conditions, reducing reliance on cook expertise while ensuring consistent results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10448776B2Cooking system
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 WHIRLPOOL CORP
  • US10448776B2 patent drawing
  • US10448776B2 patent drawing
  • US10448776B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cooking system includes a kitchen utensil and a cooking hob, wherein the kitchen utensil is provided with one or more sensors arranged on the kitchen utensil. The sensors include acceleration sensors, gyroscopic sensors, and inclination sensors. The cooking appliance is provided with a control unit configured to receive data from the sensors and to elaborate information on how the kitchen utensil is being used, and to control the cooking appliance accordingly.