Knee Arthroplasty Type Prediction From Imaging and Patient Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical systems lack effective methods for optimizing joint replacement procedures by accurately predicting the type of surgery required and determining the appropriate implant for patients based on detailed imaging and patient data analysis.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize imaging data to determine parameters such as B-scores and C-scores, combined with patient data, to predict either partial or total knee arthroplasty procedures, using a machine learning model trained on previous patient data to refine predictions and improve surgical planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual assessment methods are used for joint replacement surgery planning, then the process is simpler and requires less computational resources, but the accuracy and precision of predicting the appropriate surgery type and implant selection is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of surgery predictionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical assessment methods with an automated machine learning system that processes imaging data and patient information through computational algorithms. The machine learning model automatically predicts surgery type and implant specifications, substituting human manual evaluation with automated digital processing to improve accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized computational approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of patient anatomy through imaging data (X-rays, CT scans, MRI) and uses these digital representations to train and apply machine learning models. By working with digital copies rather than physical specimens, the system achieves high measurement precision through repeated automated analysis without increasing physical device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive imaging data and patient information are analyzed using machine learning models, then the reliability of surgical procedure prediction is improved, but the loss of time for data processing and analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of procedure predictionVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and normalizing patient data before the actual prediction task. Imaging data is pre-processed to extract relevant features, and patient information is normalized into standardized formats in advance. This preliminary preparation reduces the time required during the actual prediction process while maintaining high reliability through thorough data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs self-service by automatically selecting and weighting relevant features from the comprehensive data set without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously processes imaging data and patient information, identifying the most predictive features and generating surgery recommendations independently, which reduces both processing time and the need for extensive manual data curation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If detailed anatomical parameters such as B-scores and C-scores are calculated from imaging data, then the manufacturing precision of implant selection is improved, but the difficulty of detecting and measuring these parameters increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of implant selectionVSAvoiddifficulty of parameter extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual measurement and calculation of anatomical parameters with automated image processing algorithms. The machine learning model automatically extracts B-scores, C-scores, and other anatomical measurements from imaging data through computational analysis, eliminating the need for manual measurement and reducing errors while improving the precision of implant selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of automated image processing and feature extraction between the raw imaging data and the final implant selection. This intermediary system automatically calculates anatomical parameters, normalizes data, and prepares features for the prediction model, making the complex measurement tasks transparent and reducing the difficulty of parameter detection while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250235265A1Systems, devices, and methods for predicting total knee arthroplasty and partial knee arthroplasty procedures
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 MAKO SURGICAL CORP
  • US20250235265A1 patent drawing
  • US20250235265A1 patent drawing
  • US20250235265A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting a type of surgery required for a patient comprises: receiving imaging data including at least one image acquired of a patient's anatomy; determining at least one parameter of the patient's anatomy based on the image data, the at least one parameter including at least one of a B-score and a C-score; receiving patient data regarding the patient; generating, based at least in part on the at least one parameter and the patient data, a predicted procedure for the patient; and outputting the predicted procedure for display within a graphical user interface (GUI).