Orthopaedic Knee Impaction Instrument With Interchangeable Polymer Insert

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing orthopaedic surgical instruments lack efficient and ergonomic designs for implanting orthopaedic knee prostheses, particularly in terms of material compatibility and tactile feedback during impact, which can affect the precision and efficiency of the implantation process.

Innovation Solution

A two-piece surgical instrument comprising a metallic impaction handle and a polymer impaction insert, where the insert is removably secured to the handle, allowing for different materials to be used for impact durability and component compatibility, with features like an elongated spine for tactile feedback and a pneumatic seal for enhanced impact control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a single-material impaction instrument is used, then the structure is simple, but the impact load transfer efficiency and component compatibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidimpact load transfer efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The impaction instrument is divided into two separate components: a metallic impaction handle and a polymer impaction insert. The handle is made of metal for durability and impact resistance, while the insert is made of polymer for compatibility with knee prosthesis components. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between structural simplicity and impact load transfer efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument combines two different materials (metal and polymer) to create a composite structure. The metallic handle provides strength and impact resistance, while the polymer insert provides compatibility with prosthesis components and controlled impact characteristics. This composite approach resolves the contradiction by achieving both durability and component compatibility that neither material could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If a fixed-material impaction instrument is used, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the adaptability to different knee prosthesis components is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing process simplicityVSAvoidcomponent compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the handle and insert into independent components, the instrument allows for interchangeable inserts that can be selected and secured to match different knee prosthesis components. This segmentation enables adaptability to various components while keeping the handle manufacturing process simple and standardized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument transitions from a fixed-material design to a dynamic, interchangeable system where the polymer insert can be removed and replaced with different inserts suited for different prosthesis components. This dynamic capability enhances adaptability without significantly complicating the base handle manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If traditional impaction instruments are used, then the design is simple, but the tactile feedback during impact is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign simplicityVSAvoidtactile feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The polymer insert is designed to provide tactile feedback during the impaction process. The polymer material's properties allow the surgeon to feel the progress of implant installation through the insert, providing real-time feedback on impact application and component positioning. This feedback mechanism enhances ease of operation while adding only minimal complexity to the overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If a non-removable impaction insert is used, then the instrument structure is simple, but the ease of replacing different inserts is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument structureVSAvoidinsert replaceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument is segmented into a handle and an insert that can be easily separated and reconnected. This segmentation enables straightforward replacement of the polymer insert with different inserts suited for different prosthesis components, while maintaining a relatively simple overall instrument structure through the use of a straightforward attachment mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12357470B2Impaction instrument for implanting an orthopaedic knee prosthesis and associated method of using the same
Publication Date: 2025.07.15 DEPUY (IRELAND) LTD
  • US12357470B2 patent drawing
  • US12357470B2 patent drawing
  • US12357470B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An orthopaedic surgical instrument for use during a surgical procedure to implant a tibial tray into a surgically-prepared proximal end of a tibia and a femoral component into a surgically-prepared distal end of a femur is disclosed. The surgical instrument includes a metallic impaction handle and a removable polymeric impaction insert.