Knee Implant Side Insertion and Porous Coating Fixation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cementless knee joint implants face challenges with initial fixation stability, particularly in resisting rotation and external forces, and require complex surgical procedures with potential for bone loss during removal.

Innovation Solution

A knee joint implant design featuring a tibial component with protrusion portions that expand laterally and then shrink, allowing for side insertion and improved resistance to vertical forces, along with a porous coating for bone ingrowth, simplifies surgical procedures and reduces bone removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional uncemented TKA is used, then bone remodeling with structural enhancement is achieved and possibility of aseptic loosening is reduced, but initial implant fixation stability is difficult to achieve

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial implant fixation stabilityVSAvoidimplant fixation stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The tibial component is divided into multiple functional elements: a keel portion for rotational stability, multiple peg portions for vertical load resistance, and a porous coating layer for bone ingrowth. This segmentation allows each element to address specific fixation challenges, collectively achieving stable initial fixation that conventional single-structure implants cannot provide.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The implant combines different materials with complementary properties: a metallic base structure providing mechanical strength and stability, and a porous coating layer promoting biological bone ingrowth. This composite approach ensures both immediate mechanical fixation and long-term biological integration, resolving the contradiction between initial stability and long-term reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If conventional top-loading insertion method is used, then implant can be inserted, but surgical procedure is complicated and invasive with potential bone loss

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical procedure simplicityVSAvoidbone loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of inserting the implant from the top (conventional method), the design enables side insertion through the tibial plateau. This inverted approach simplifies the surgical procedure by avoiding complex dislocation maneuvers, reduces surgical invasiveness, and minimizes bone loss while still achieving stable implant fixation through the specially designed keel and peg structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Force

If conventional keel structure is used, then rotational stability is achieved, but coronal and sagittal stability is insufficient due to lift-off and vertical forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational stabilityVSAvoidcoronal and sagittal resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The design merges the functions of rotational stability (keel portion) and vertical/coronal stability (multiple peg portions) into a single integrated structure. The keel and pegs work together as a unified fixation system, where the keel prevents rotation while the pegs resist vertical loads and coronal forces, achieving comprehensive stability that neither element could provide alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The fixation structure extends into multiple spatial dimensions: the keel portion provides stability in the horizontal plane (rotation), while the vertically oriented peg portions provide resistance in the vertical and coronal dimensions. This multi-dimensional approach comprehensively addresses forces from all directions, resolving the limitation of single-plane keel structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If limited amount of PMMA is used during TKA, then surgery time is reduced, but initial implant fixation is less than optimal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgery timeVSAvoidinitial implant fixation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The design extracts the dependency on PMMA cement by employing a cementless fixation system with porous coating. The implant achieves fixation through direct bone ingrowth into the porous structure and mechanical interlocking of the keel and peg portions, eliminating the need for PMMA entirely. This allows for shorter surgery time without compromising initial implant fixation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enhances stability by resisting rotation and external forces, simplifies surgical procedures, minimizes bone loss, and promotes bone ingrowth, providing stable fixation and reduced recovery time.

Implementation Method 1

a porous coating for bone ingrowth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPorosity: Porosity

Data Source

PatentUS11090164B2Knee joint implant
Publication Date: 2021.08.17 CORENTEC
  • US11090164B2 patent drawing
  • US11090164B2 patent drawing
  • US11090164B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A knee joint implant is capable of resolving issues of conventional cementless or uncemented implants. The knee joint implant improves fixing force of the implant in a vertical direction and provides improved initial fixation for the implant.