Total Knee Prosthesis Median Protuberance Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing 'postero-stabilized' total knee prostheses experience significant strain and wear on bone anchorings due to impacts between the femoral and tibial implants, particularly at the protuberance, leading to potential loosening and increased wear over time.

Innovation Solution

The design features curved condylian portions and a median protuberance with a posterior boss and anterior portion that form a smooth transition, providing strong congruence and stability, reducing impact and wear by allowing soft contact during joint extension and hyperextension, and incorporating marked and rounded angles for reinforced guidance without substantial wear.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a postero-stabilized prosthesis with a rounded boss and median protuberance is used to prevent anterior luxation, then stability against anterior luxation is improved, but impact strain on bone anchorings and wear at the protuberance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability against anterior luxationVSAvoidstrain on bone anchorings and wear at protuberance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The median protuberance is segmented into distinct functional zones: a posterior boss with convex upper face for guidance, a central recessed area for shock absorption, and an anterior portion with concave upper face for engagement. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function, reducing overall impact strain while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The central recessed area with smooth transition is designed beforehand to cushion impacts between the femoral implant's inter-condylian edge and the tibial implant's protuberance. This recessed zone absorbs shock during flexural movement, preventing direct impact transmission to the bone anchorings and reducing wear at the protuberance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Stability of the object's composition

If condylian portions and glenoid surfaces are made strongly congruent to improve stability throughout joint movement, then prosthetic stability is improved, but complexity of the implant design increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability throughout joint movementVSAvoidcomplexity of implant design
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The condylian portions are given a curved shape in both the sagittal plane and transverse plane, matching the natural curvature of the femoral condyles. The glenoid surfaces are correspondingly curved to receive these condylian portions. This spherical/curved geometry naturally provides congruence and stability throughout the range of motion while following anatomical forms, making the design both effective and relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Data Source

PatentEP2635237B1Total knee prosthesis
Publication Date: 2015.02.25 KOKAB
  • EP2635237B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2635237B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP2635237B1 patent drawingFigure 6~8

AI summary

In this prosthesis the condylian portions of the femoral implant and glenoid surfaces (25) of tibial implant are congruent; the femoral implant comprises an anterior inter-condylian wall forming a lower inter-condylian edge; and the intermediate plate (20) comprises a median protuberance (26); with a posterior boss (30) with a convex upper face in the sagittal plane, which plunges down towards the central area (32) of the protuberance (26), and an anterior portion (31 ) with a concave upper face in the sagittal plane which emerges from this same central area (32), said central area (32) thus having a recess continuously connected to the posterior boss (30), this recess is located so that in an extension or hyperextension of the joint, said lower inter-condylian edge (12) is immediately below it, or slightly engaged on the anterior portion of the posterior boss (30).