Knee Prosthesis Hyperbolic Paraboloid Surfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing total knee prostheses face challenges in achieving optimal tribological and kinematic compatibility, leading to wear issues and discomfort due to unidirectional movements, high pressure points, and instability, particularly during flexion and extension.

Innovation Solution

A novel total knee prosthesis design featuring a femoral implant with convex intercondylar notch and concave glenoid cavities forming complementary hyperbolic paraboloid surfaces, preventing roll-forward phenomena without abutments or cams, and including stabilization reinforcements to maintain stability and unconstrained kinematics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If postero-stabilized configuration with cam and abutment is used, then stability during flexion is improved, but movement becomes unidirectional and constrained causing abutment and repulsion sensations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestability during flexionVSAvoidmovement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the cam and abutment elements from the prosthesis design, eliminating the constrained unidirectional movement mechanism while maintaining stability through alternative means (femoral component geometry and polyethylene insert design)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using active cam-abutment engagement to enforce stability, the invention inverts the approach by designing passive geometric congruence between the femoral component and polyethylene insert that naturally provides stability through contact surface mating

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If guiding surfaces configuration without planar contact surfaces is used, then movement freedom is improved, but high pressure points are created accelerating wear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement freedomVSAvoidwear resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs curved, congruent contact surfaces between the femoral component and polyethylene insert, specifically the mating surfaces of the femoral component and the polyethylene insert that form a conformal interface to distribute loads and reduce wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Reliability

If high congruence between contact surfaces is used, then wear reduction is improved, but movement adaptability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear reductionVSAvoidmovement adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a dynamic interface where the femoral component can rotate and translate relative to the tibial component through the polyethylene insert, with the congruent surfaces adapting their contact pattern during movement while maintaining wear resistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8540776B2Total knee prosthesis
Publication Date: 2013.09.24 BERCOVY MICHEL
  • US8540776B2 patent drawing
  • US8540776B2 patent drawing
  • US8540776B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a total knee prosthesis. This prosthesis includes a femoral implant (2) including two condyles (8, 9) delimiting between them an intercondylar notch (10), a tibial implant (3) intended to rest on the end of the tibia, and an articular insert (4) interposed between the tibial implant and the femoral implant and the upper surface of which (41) includes two glenoid cavities (18, 19) with an external profile (181, 191) congruent with the external profile (81, 91) of the condyles (7, 8) of the femoral implant and connected together through an interglenoidal connecting surface (20). According to the invention, the intercondylar notch (10) and the interglenoidal connecting surface (20) have congruent contact surfaces (101, 201) which are inscribed in two mating hyperbolic paraboloids and the contact surface (181, 191) of the glenoid cavities (18, 19) have in a horizontal section an ovoid shape and its inclined point (P) is located posteriorly to the line of larger width (L) of the insert.