Folding Knife Locking Arm Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing folding knives lack a reliable and user-friendly locking mechanism that ensures the blade remains securely locked in both open and closed positions, with a need for improved safety and ease of operation.

Innovation Solution

A folding knife with a spring-urged self-repositioning safety lock arm that engages the blade shank during opening and closing, requiring user initiation to unlock, featuring multiple engagement points for continuous locking and retention, utilizing a resilient spring and guide pins for precise blade control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a simple locking mechanism is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of blade locking is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade locking reliabilityVSAvoidlocking mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is divided into multiple independent locking arms (first locking arm and second locking arm) that can operate independently. Each locking arm has its own engagement features and control mechanisms, allowing the system to achieve high reliability through redundancy while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking arms are designed to be movable and repositionable rather than fixed. The first locking arm can pivot between engaged and disengaged positions, and the second locking arm can move along its engagement path. This dynamic design allows the mechanism to adapt to different blade positions and provide continuous locking reliability without requiring overly complex fixed structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If multiple locking arms are added to improve security, then the reliability improves, but the ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retention reliabilityVSAvoidunlocking ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control member is pre-configured with multiple engagement features that correspond to the locking arms. When the control member is actuated, it simultaneously engages or disengages multiple locking arms through pre-established mechanical connections. This preliminary configuration allows multiple locking arms to be controlled by a single user action, maintaining ease of operation while improving reliability through multi-point locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple locking arms and their control mechanisms are merged into a unified control system. The control member serves as a common interface that can engage or disengage multiple locking arms simultaneously. This merging reduces the number of separate user actions required while maintaining the security benefits of multiple locking points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the locking mechanism requires user initiation to unlock, then the safety improves, but the ease of operation worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety lockingVSAvoidblade release ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking mechanism is designed to automatically engage and lock the blade without requiring continuous user intervention. The spring member provides automatic return motion to engage the locking arms, and the control member maintains engagement through its mechanical design. The system serves itself by using the blade's own movement and the spring's stored energy to maintain locking, reducing the need for frequent manual operations while ensuring safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If continuous intermediate positioning is provided, then the adaptability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade position controlVSAvoidpositioning mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking arms are designed with continuous movement capability rather than fixed positions. The first locking arm can pivot through a range of motion, and the second locking arm can move continuously along its engagement path. This dynamic design enables continuous intermediate positioning to accommodate different blade angles and positions while maintaining a relatively simple mechanical structure based on basic pivoting and sliding motions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides a secure and intuitive locking mechanism that ensures the blade remains locked in open and closed positions, enhancing safety and usability by allowing controlled blade motion with multiple engagement points and spring-activated retention.

Implementation Method 1

A resilient spring and guide pins control the arm's movement and retention engagement with the blade shank

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS10632632B1Arm blade engagement lock for folding knife
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 DEMKO ANDREW
  • US10632632B1 patent drawing
  • US10632632B1 patent drawing
  • US10632632B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A folding knife having a blade pivoted from a closed position to an open locked position with a combined self-activating sliding release and locking arm. The sliding locking arm is mounted within the knife handle on dual fixed guide and pivot pins within respective arm openings being spring urged there against. Arm projections are engaged by the blade shank during operation moving the locking arm back and up then releasing to slide forward locking the blade in open use position until manual arm engagement by the user against the spring for release and transitional closure.