Knit Design System for Body-Fit Customization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing methods for mass customization of knit wear using flat knitting machines require a large number of design data pieces to be prepared in advance, which is time-consuming and burdensome for operators, as customer bodies vary significantly, necessitating a system to reduce the number of design data pieces needed.

Innovation Solution

A knit design system that includes an input unit for customer measurements, a memory for basic data, a selection unit to match measurements with stored data, calculation units to adjust stitch rows, and a change determination unit to modify design data by adding or deleting stitch rows in variable courses, while maintaining a predetermined design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a huge number of design data pieces are prepared in advance to accommodate various body dimensions, then customization capability is improved, but the time and burden for creating design data increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoidtime for creating design data
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments design data into a limited set of basic size categories (e.g., S, M, L, XL) with predetermined stitch row configurations. Instead of creating custom design data for every possible body dimension, the system divides the customization space into discrete segments that can be efficiently stored and modified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic modification capability that allows automatic adjustment of stitch row numbers based on input body measurements. The system dynamically calculates the required number of stitch rows using reference values and adjustment coefficients, enabling real-time customization without pre-preparing all possible design variants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If design data is manually modified for each customer measurement, then customization precision is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization precisionVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical modification of design data with an automated calculation system. The control unit automatically computes the required stitch row numbers based on input measurements and predetermined formulas, eliminating the need for operators to manually adjust each design data piece while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter-based adjustment where body measurements are converted into specific design parameters (stitch row numbers) through mathematical relationships. By changing the input parameters (body dimensions) and applying predetermined adjustment coefficients, the system automatically generates precise customized design data without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If the number of stitch rows is freely adjusted to match body measurements, then fit accuracy is improved, but design integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefit accuracyVSAvoiddesign integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing stitch row number adjustments only in specific regions where such changes do not affect the overall design pattern. The system modifies local parameters (stitch row counts in non-pattern areas) while preserving the integrity of the knitted fabric design in critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining adjustment coefficients and reference values for different body types and design styles. These predetermined parameters guide the automatic calculation process to ensure that modifications maintain design integrity while achieving accurate fit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3763861B1Knit design system to create a pattern data adapted to a length size of a body
Publication Date: 2023.03.08 SHIMA SEIKI MFG LTD
  • EP3763861B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3763861B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3763861B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Provided is a knit design system with which it is possible to knit a knitted fabric that fits to the body of a customer, and reduce the number of pieces of design data to be prepared in advance. The knit design system includes a memory, a selection unit, a first calculation unit, a second calculation unit, a change determination unit, and a creating unit. The memory has design data (basic data) that corresponds to a predetermined number of body dimensions set in advance stored therein. The selection unit selects, from the basic data, possible data that is fitted to the actual measurement of the body of a customer. The second calculation unit calculates, based on a difference between a length dimension obtained by the first calculation unit based on the actual measurement and a length dimension of the possible data, the number of stitch rows along the course direction that are to be used for a change in a length direction. In the basic data, variable courses in which insertion and deletion of stitch rows along the course direction are possible, and a fixed course in which insertion and deletion are prohibited are set. The change determination unit selects the stitch rows from the variable courses. The creating unit creates modification data, by adding or deleting the stitch rows with respect to the possible data.