Knitting Machine Selector Mechanism for High-Gauge Stitching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional weft knitting machines face challenges in increasing gauge without significantly increasing the number of components in the needle selection mechanism, making it difficult to produce fine-stitched knitted products, especially elastic portions like those in gloves, due to the complexity and cost associated with a large number of needles.

Innovation Solution

A weft knitting machine design where multiple knitting needles with protruding butts are operated simultaneously by a selector, allowing them to slide along cam grooves, enabling independent operation and reducing the number of components in the needle selection mechanism, while also facilitating inlaid knitting by using different height butts and cam grooves to control the knitting process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the number of knitting needles is increased to achieve higher gauge and finer stitches, then the manufacturing precision and product quality are improved, but the number of components in the needle selection mechanism increases, leading to increased device complexity and manufacturing cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestitch finenessVSAvoidneedle selection mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple knitting needles (specifically two adjacent needles) are controlled by a single selector component. The selector simultaneously moves both needles to the protruding side, allowing them to be operated together as a unit. This merging of control functions reduces the total number of selectors needed in the needle selection mechanism, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining the ability to knit fine-stitched high-gauge products

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If hooks in one needle groove operate integrally to reduce the number of selectors, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to perform inlaid knitting and elastic portion knitting is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveneedle selection mechanism simplicityVSAvoidknitting method versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Different heights of butts are provided on knitting needles to create local differentiation. By varying the butt height, the system can selectively control which needles participate in specific knitting operations. This allows integral operation of multiple needles through a single selector while maintaining the ability to perform different knitting methods (including inlaid knitting and elastic portion knitting) by selectively engaging needles with appropriate butt heights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The height of the butt on knitting needles is changed as a key parameter to enable different knitting functions. By providing butts of different heights, the system can selectively engage needles for specific knitting operations such as inlaid knitting or elastic portion knitting, even when multiple needles are controlled by a single selector. This parameter variation maintains knitting method versatility while reducing mechanism complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single jack controls multiple hooks to reduce component numbers, then device complexity is reduced, but individual needle operation capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent quantityVSAvoidindividual needle operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Different heights of butts are provided on knitting needles to create local differentiation. By varying the butt height, the system can selectively control which needles participate in specific knitting operations. This allows integral operation of multiple needles through a single selector while maintaining the ability to perform different knitting methods (including inlaid knitting and elastic portion knitting) by selectively engaging needles with appropriate butt heights

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static one-to-one needle-selector correspondence to a dynamic many-to-one relationship where a single selector can control multiple needles with different butt heights. This dynamic configuration allows the same selector to adaptively control different sets of needles for different knitting operations, maintaining individual needle operation capability while reducing overall component numbers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for the efficient production of high-gauge, fine-stitched knitted products with reduced component complexity, enabling cost-effective manufacturing of gloves with elastic portions through inlaid knitting.

Implementation Method 1

a carriage having a cam groove along which the butt of the knitting needle moved by the selector to the side where the butt is protrudingly provided can slide

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Data Source

PatentUS9663880B2Method for manufacturing knitted glove
Publication Date: 2017.05.30 SHOWA GLOVE CO
  • US9663880B2 patent drawing
  • US9663880B2 patent drawing
  • US9663880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A knitting machine that is capable of: knitting a knitted product of high gauge while effectively preventing increase in the number of components in a needle selection mechanism, and performing knitting methods such as inlaid knitting easily and reliably. The knitting machine comprises a plurality of knitting needles each of which have a protrudingly provided butt and which are arranged substantially parallel to each other so as to be able to perform a knitting operation independently, a plurality of selectors that move the knitting needles toward a protruding side of the butt, and a carriage having a cam groove along which the butt of the knitting needle, which has been moved by the selector to the side where the butt is protrudingly provided, can slide, in which the selector moves at least two adjacent knitting needles simultaneously to the side where the butt is protrudingly provided.