Knowledge Artifact Management via Automated Tagging and Quality Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current knowledge management systems fail to effectively store and retrieve artifacts across projects, leading to redundant activities and decreased project performance due to the lack of a method to manage and transfer knowledge between projects.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for managing artifacts in a knowledge ecosystem, which involves receiving and storing new artifacts, categorizing and tagging them, deriving knowledge from additional information, and storing it in a knowledge base for future project retrieval, while also evaluating and ranking the quality of artifacts for efficient project implementation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If artifacts are stored and managed systematically in a knowledge base, then knowledge transfer between projects is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge transferVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments knowledge management into distinct components: artifact storage, categorization, tagging, and retrieval functions. Each component handles specific aspects of knowledge management independently, reducing overall system complexity while improving knowledge transfer efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary knowledge base that mediates between project artifacts and future project needs. This intermediary layer standardizes knowledge representation through categories and tags, enabling efficient knowledge transfer without requiring complex direct connections between all projects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If automated categorization and tagging is implemented, then knowledge retrieval efficiency is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary categorization and tagging actions at the time of artifact creation or import. By pre-processing artifacts with appropriate categories and tags during the initial storage phase, the system enables rapid retrieval later without incurring processing delays during knowledge access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive artifact metadata is collected and stored, then knowledge accuracy is improved, but data storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge accuracyVSAvoiddata storage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by storing different types and levels of metadata information in different locations within the system. Critical identification information (categories, tags) is stored efficiently in indexed structures, while full artifact data is stored in the artifact database, optimizing both retrieval accuracy and storage utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10803390B1Method for the management of artifacts in knowledge ecosystems
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO
  • US10803390B1 patent drawing
  • US10803390B1 patent drawing
  • US10803390B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the management of artifacts in knowledge ecosystems is disclosed. The management of artifacts may be performed through the interaction of project participants with a computing device which may display a project repository interface of a software module within a knowledge ecosystem. The method may include the process to retrieve an artifact from a knowledge base to store in the project repository, and the process to store a new artifact in the knowledge base. Moreover, the method may include a process for associating a retention policy, a quality rank and suitable categories and tags to each artifact stored in the knowledge base, which may facilitate the selection of a suitable artifact according to the project requirements. As a result, the method for the management of artifacts may allow leveraging human expertise, saving human efforts, improving decision-making and fostering innovation.