Knowledge Generation Machine Dynamic Node Scaling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Software deployment in complex enterprise environments faces challenges due to limited deployment rules, scalability issues in knowledge base generation, and the need for manual updates in knowledge models, leading to installation deadlocks and inefficiencies, especially in open source environments.

Innovation Solution

A Knowledge Generation Machine (KGM) dynamically manages nodes for processing and scaling knowledge, using performance feedback to allocate resources and handle large volumes of information, and automatically adapts the knowledge model with new information without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional knowledge base with limited deployment rules is used, then software deployment follows a narrow and constrictive path, but this leads to frequent installation deadlocks and requires manual tinkering

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment success rateVSAvoidmanual intervention required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes parameters of deployment rules based on environmental feedback. The knowledge base evolves by modifying existing rules and creating new ones based on actual installation outcomes, transforming static deployment parameters into adaptive ones that respond to system state changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The deployment system performs self-service through automated knowledge generation and rule validation. The system automatically collects installation data, generates new deployment rules, and validates them without requiring manual administrator intervention, enabling the knowledge base to self-improve over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If very generic deployment rules are defined to avoid constrictive paths, then installation flexibility increases, but the rules cannot be properly tested and validation becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation scenario flexibilityVSAvoidrule validation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial validation by testing deployment rules against representative subsets of environmental permutations rather than attempting to validate all possible scenarios. This allows generic rules to be tested sufficiently without requiring exhaustive validation of every possible installation context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary validation of deployment rules by simulating installations in controlled environments before actual deployment. This preliminary testing phase allows generic rules to be validated against common scenarios without requiring complete validation of all possible environmental variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If mass amounts of information are processed to build comprehensive knowledge base, then knowledge coverage improves, but scalability of converting information into formatted knowledge becomes a problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge coverageVSAvoidknowledge processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The knowledge processing system segments information processing into modular components that can be independently processed and validated. By dividing the comprehensive information processing task into smaller segments, the system maintains knowledge coverage while improving processing throughput and scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses templates and patterns to copy proven knowledge structures rather than processing each piece of information from scratch. Once knowledge is validated in one context, it can be copied and adapted to similar contexts, dramatically improving processing efficiency while maintaining comprehensive knowledge coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If manual updates are performed to extend knowledge model with new information, then knowledge model accuracy can be maintained, but the process requires continuous manual intervention and is time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge model accuracyVSAvoidmanual update time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback loops where deployment outcomes are continuously monitored and fed back into the knowledge base. This feedback mechanism automatically triggers knowledge model updates when new patterns are detected, maintaining accuracy without requiring continuous manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The knowledge model performs self-service by automatically detecting when new information patterns emerge from deployment data and initiating its own update process. The system autonomously validates and integrates new knowledge, eliminating the need for manual updates while preserving model accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7761395B2System and method for scalable processing of collected knowledge by creating knowledge generation nodes
Publication Date: 2010.07.20 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US7761395B2 patent drawing
  • US7761395B2 patent drawing
  • US7761395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A knowledge generation machine (KGM) that can scale to the high volumes of software processing that may be required, as well as manage the unpredictable nature of the size of each processing element, is provided. A KGM master dynamically creates and destroys KGM nodes based on availability, performance, and resource allocation. Unlike the conventional systems, the present KGM receives performance feedback from KGM nodes and can use that performance information in determining which KGM nodes should be assigned information, reused, or destroyed. Further, efficient garbage collection ensures that resources can be de-allocated when needed. Thus, the KGM can scale to handle large spikes of incoming information.