Knowledge-Graph Cyberattack Planning for Consistent Red-Blue Assessments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Red and blue team cybersecurity assessments rely heavily on individual expertise, leading to variability in quality and incomplete coverage of potential cybersecurity concerns due to gaps in knowledge and experience, with existing automated tools failing to integrate evolving network data effectively.

Innovation Solution

An AI-assisted cybersecurity mission planning system using a knowledge graph, machine learning algorithms, and a control center to generate cyberattack scenarios, suggest attack and defense strategies, and track evolving team knowledge, integrating data from various tools and databases to enhance comprehensive analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If red and blue team assessments rely entirely on individual expertise, then the process is simple and intuitive, but the quality varies substantially and coverage is incomplete due to knowledge gaps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of assessment processVSAvoidquality consistency of assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated penetration testing system as an intermediary between human red/blue team members. This system incorporates attack path planners and execution engines that objectively analyze network vulnerabilities, eliminating the variability caused by individual expertise differences while maintaining operational simplicity through automated reporting and standardized assessment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human intuition and trial-and-error assessment with an automated computational system. The attack path planner uses algorithms to systematically explore potential attack vectors, and the execution engine automatically tests identified vulnerabilities, substituting human cognitive processes with deterministic computational methods that ensure consistent, comprehensive coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If automated penetration testing tools are used, then manpower is reduced, but the tools fail to integrate evolving network data to reflect dynamic attacker-defender interactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction in manpower requirementsVSAvoidability to reflect dynamic network environment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic assessment system where the attack path planner continuously re-evaluates potential attack paths based on real-time network state changes. As defenders implement countermeasures or network configurations change, the system automatically updates its analysis to reflect the new environment, maintaining adaptability while operating with minimal human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where the execution engine reports results back to the attack path planner, which then adjusts subsequent testing strategies based on discovered vulnerabilities and defender responses. This closed-loop system enables automated tools to learn from each interaction and adapt their approach, mirroring the dynamic nature of real attacker-defender engagements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If red and blue teams operate based on personal knowledge and trial and error, then individual creativity is utilized, but gaps in knowledge dictate the outcome and comprehensive coverage is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecreative problem solving capabilityVSAvoidgaps in cybersecurity knowledge coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal assessment platform that integrates multiple assessment functions into a single system. The attack path planner simultaneously considers various attack methodologies (social engineering, technical exploits, physical access), and the execution engine can test multiple vulnerability types across diverse network configurations, ensuring comprehensive coverage that no single human expert could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple sources of expertise into a composite assessment system. By integrating attack path planning algorithms, execution engines, and analysis components into a unified platform, the system synthesizes diverse knowledge domains (network security, application security, physical security) into a cohesive assessment capability that exceeds individual human expertise while retaining creative problem-solving through structured exploration of attack scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12452284B2Dynamic cyberattack mission planning and analysis
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 QOMPLX INC
  • US12452284B2 patent drawing
  • US12452284B2 patent drawing
  • US12452284B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for cybersecurity mission planning and analysis which uses artificial intelligence systems to make red and blue team exercises more comprehensive and effective by supplementing individual expertise, reducing reliance on intuition, and eliminating gaps in knowledge. In an embodiment, a platform for cyberattack missions planning and analysis by red and blue teams is coordinated by a control center. An incident generator generates cyberattack scenarios and events using data from external databases and an internal attack knowledge manager having a knowledge graph of data about the network under attack in conjunction with one or more machine learning algorithms configured to identify potential network vulnerabilities. Red are guided by a machine learning algorithm configured to provide suggestions as to potential successful attack paths. Blue teams are guided by a machine learning algorithm configured to provide suggestions as to potential successful attack paths.