Personalized Drug Contraindication Detection via Knowledge Graph Traversal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining drug contraindications are inadequate as they do not account for individual patient-specific physiological characteristics, leading to missed potentially harmful drug interactions and reliance on trial-and-error approaches that are time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

A knowledge graph data structure is used, with nodes representing proteins, biological processes, and drugs, and edges weighted based on medical data associated with a user identifier, allowing for biased random traversals to identify contraindications personalized to the patient's physiological state.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If generalized contraindication evaluation methods are used, then the evaluation process is simple and quick, but the accuracy of treatment selection is reduced and patient-specific contraindications are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of treatment selectionVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation system into distinct functional modules: a knowledge graph construction module that integrates multiple data sources (drug databases, biomedical literature, clinical trial data), a patient data processing module that extracts and standardizes individual patient characteristics, and a contraindication analysis module that performs personalized risk assessment. This modular segmentation enables high measurement precision through comprehensive data integration while managing system complexity through organized functional decomposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional one-dimensional contraindication checking (simple drug-drug interaction lists) to multi-dimensional personalized assessment by incorporating diverse data dimensions including patient genetics, comorbidities, concurrent medications, and individual physiological parameters. This dimensional expansion enables accurate identification of patient-specific contraindications that generalized methods would miss, resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If trial-and-error approaches are used to identify contraindications, then the evaluation process is resource-intensive and time-consuming, but comprehensive patient-specific analysis can be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetime for contraindication identificationVSAvoidcompleteness of contraindication detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-construction of a comprehensive knowledge graph that integrates drug interaction data, biomedical knowledge, and clinical evidence before patient evaluation. The system pre-processes and structures vast amounts of contraindication information into an accessible graph format, enabling rapid querying and analysis during actual patient assessments. This preliminary preparation eliminates the need for time-consuming trial-and-error approaches while maintaining complete and reliable contraindication detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where contraindication analysis results are continuously refined based on patient responses and clinical outcomes. The knowledge graph is dynamically updated with new evidence and patient-specific data, improving the reliability of contraindication detection over time while maintaining efficient processing speeds through learned patterns from previous assessments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If individualized knowledge graph traversal is performed, then personalized contraindication identification is achieved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of contraindication analysisVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by performing knowledge graph traversal selectively rather than exhaustively. The system identifies and prioritizes relevant patient-specific pathways based on individual characteristics, focusing computational resources on high-probability contraindication routes. This selective traversal approach maintains high personalization and adaptability while significantly improving processing efficiency by avoiding unnecessary exploration of irrelevant graph pathways.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20230197231A1Personalized determination of drug contraindications using biochemical knowledge graphs
Publication Date: 2023.06.22 UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC
  • US20230197231A1 patent drawing
  • US20230197231A1 patent drawing
  • US20230197231A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments of the present disclosure disclose generating contraindication alert communications. A knowledge graph data structure, including a graph-based representation associated with a user identifier and having nodes and edges, is accessed. Edge weights are adjusted based on medical data associated with the user identifier. One or more sequential traversals of the knowledge graph data structure are performed until an equilibrium condition is met. Based on determining that a subset of nodes is associated with visit tallies totaling more than a threshold proportion of all node visits associated with the one or more sequential traversals, a contraindication alert communication, which includes representation of a biological effect for the user identifier, can be generated and transmitted.