Knowledge Graph State Prediction for Road Users

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an effective method to determine the state and behavior of technical systems, such as infrastructure elements and road users, to enable real-time control and prediction of interactions within complex environments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a knowledge graph representation, where nodes represent objects like infrastructure elements and road users, and edges represent relationships, allowing for the prediction of behavior based on training data and environment information to control the technical system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current systems are used to determine state and behavior of technical systems, then existing infrastructure can be monitored, but accurate prediction and control of interactions in complex environments cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments complex environmental interactions into discrete objects (infrastructure elements, road users, environment information) and their relationships, representing them as separate nodes and edges in a knowledge graph. This segmentation enables manageable processing of complex interactions while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional state monitoring to a multi-dimensional knowledge representation space where objects and their relationships are encoded as vectors. This dimensional transformation enables the system to capture complex interactions and predict behaviors that cannot be achieved with conventional monitoring approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If detailed information about objects and relationships is stored, then prediction accuracy improves, but data storage and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate determination precisionVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms detailed object and relationship information into parameterized vector representations with fixed dimensions. This parameterization allows the system to maintain high measurement precision for state determination while controlling data volume through standardized vector formats and dimensionality reduction techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of storing raw detailed information about all objects and relationships, the system creates compressed vector copies that capture essential characteristics. These vector representations preserve the necessary information for accurate prediction while significantly reducing storage requirements compared to storing complete detailed data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Speed

If real-time control of technical systems is implemented, then system responsiveness improves, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol responsivenessVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing environmental information and maintaining updated knowledge graphs of objects and relationships. This preliminary structuring of data enables faster real-time inference and control decisions, reducing the computational energy required during actual control operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical control systems with information-based control using knowledge graphs and predictive modeling. This substitution enables more efficient real-time control by using computational inference based on pre-processed knowledge rather than reactive mechanical responses, improving responsiveness while managing computational energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240152773A1Device and computer-implemented method for determining a state of a technical system
Publication Date: 2024.05.09 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20240152773A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152773A1 patent drawing
  • US20240152773A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Device and computer-implemented method for determining a state of a technical system, in particular of an infrastructure element or of a road user. A first node represents a first object, in particular the technical system, a second node represents a second object, in particular a further infrastructure element or a further road user. An edge between the first node and the second node represents a relationship between the objects. A prediction is determined which characterizes a behavior of one of the objects. The determination is in accordance with information about the objects and in accordance with a representation of a knowledge graph which includes the first node, the second node, and the edge. The state is determined in accordance with the prediction.