Knowledge Manager for Contradictory Review Display

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face challenges in making informed purchasing decisions online due to the lack of personal evaluation of items, leading to negative biased reviews influencing their choices without considering contradictory opinions.

Innovation Solution

A knowledge manager system identifies and displays contradictory reviews to provide a more balanced understanding by analyzing user importance factors and personality profiles, showcasing positive reviews that contradict negative ones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If consumers rely on online reviews to make purchasing decisions, then they can access information about item quality and features, but they may be influenced by negatively biased reviews and make inaccurate decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoiddecision accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments reviews by identifying and separating opinion phrases with specific sentiments (positive, negative, neutral) and aspects (e.g., quality, price, features). This segmentation allows the system to present contradictory opinions side-by-side, enabling consumers to see both positive and negative perspectives on specific aspects, thereby improving decision accuracy while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of information presentation from a simple aggregate rating to a structured breakdown of opinion phrases with sentiments and aspects. By transforming the review data into sentiment-aspect pairs, the system enables consumers to evaluate contradictory opinions on specific parameters, reducing the influence of negatively biased overall ratings and improving purchasing decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If consumers read multiple reviews to gain a balanced understanding, then they can reduce the impact of negative bias, but they spend excessive time researching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidresearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by automatically analyzing, segmenting, and organizing multiple reviews into sentiment-aspect pairs before the consumer arrives. The system pre-identifies contradictory opinions and presents them in a structured format, eliminating the need for consumers to manually read and compare multiple reviews. This preliminary processing reduces research time while maintaining high decision accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary system (the review analysis platform) that mediates between the raw review data and the consumer. This intermediary automatically processes multiple reviews, identifies contradictory opinions, and presents them in a simplified format, saving consumers the time required to manually research while providing accurate balanced information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If online review systems display all reviews equally, then consumers can access comprehensive information, but negative biased reviews dominate consumer perception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessibilityVSAvoidnegative bias influence
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different aspects of reviews differently. Instead of displaying all reviews equally, the system identifies specific aspects (e.g., quality, price, service) and presents contradictory opinions on each aspect separately. This allows positive and negative reviews to be contextualized locally within each aspect, reducing the disproportionate influence of negative bias while maintaining comprehensive information accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional review display approach by not presenting reviews in chronological or rating order, but rather by presenting contradictory opinions side-by-side for each aspect. This inversion allows consumers to see both positive and negative perspectives equally, counteracting the natural tendency for negative reviews to dominate perception while maintaining full information accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS9940395B2Influence business benefit from user reviews and cognitive dissonance
Publication Date: 2018.04.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9940395B2 patent drawing
  • US9940395B2 patent drawing
  • US9940395B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach is provided in which a knowledge manager identifies first opinion phrases included in a first review that the knowledge manager displays on a display. The knowledge manager locates contradictory reviews that include second opinion phrases that contradict the first opinion phrases and, in turn, displays the contradictory reviews on the display.