Knowledge Model Refactoring For Clinical Record Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing knowledge models and systems rely heavily on rules to evaluate electronic records, leading to increased complexity, resource consumption, and maintenance challenges as the amount of information grows.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a contextually intelligent framework that refactors rules within a knowledge model, generating composite thresholds and reducing the number of rules while increasing the number of concepts, thereby improving the internal structure and consistency of the knowledge model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the number of rules in the knowledge model is increased to handle more information, then the coverage and evaluation capability improve, but the complexity and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage capabilityVSAvoidrule complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple rules with different thresholds into a single unified rule structure. The system combines several threshold-based rules into one rule that uses a unified threshold mechanism, reducing the total number of rules while maintaining the ability to handle diverse information types and evaluation scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal rule structure that can handle multiple types of evaluations through a single unified threshold mechanism. The unified threshold can be dynamically adjusted to serve different evaluation purposes, making the rule system more versatile without requiring separate rules for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If more rules are added to the knowledge model, then the evaluation coverage improves, but the resource consumption and maintenance difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation coverageVSAvoidmaintenance ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple maintenance-intensive rules into a single unified rule, significantly reducing the maintenance burden. Instead of maintaining numerous separate rules with different thresholds, the system maintains one unified rule with a single threshold mechanism that can be adjusted to serve multiple evaluation needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes (specifically, dynamic threshold adjustment) to enable a single rule to adapt to different evaluation scenarios. By changing the threshold parameter rather than creating new rules, the system maintains flexibility while reducing maintenance complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the knowledge model uses multiple rules with different thresholds, then the precision of evaluation improves, but the consistency and structural simplicity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation precisionVSAvoidknowledge model consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains evaluation precision by allowing the unified threshold parameter to be dynamically adjusted based on the specific evaluation context. The threshold can be modified to reflect different precision requirements while maintaining a consistent rule structure, thus preserving both precision and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The unified rule structure serves multiple evaluation functions while maintaining structural consistency. The same rule framework is used across different evaluation scenarios, ensuring consistency in the knowledge model structure while adapting to different precision requirements through parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20250165868A1Systems And Methods For Refactoring A Knowledge Model To Increase Domain Knowledge And Reconcile Electronic Records
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 CERNER INNOVATION INC
  • US20250165868A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165868A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165868A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and computer-readable media are disclosed herein that employ a contextually intelligent framework. In accordance with embodiments, a knowledge model having rules, axioms, and a domain ontology is evaluated to determine rules that are redundant to other rules and axioms, to determines those rules thresholds that may be refactored to generate composite rules and reduce the overall quantity of rules in the knowledge model, and to generate and add new concepts as axioms to the domain ontology as determined through refactoring. Methods, systems, and computer-readable media are disclosed herein that use the refactored and improved knowledge model to reconcile information currently stored in one system with information imported from a plurality of diverse systems, in order to generate recommendations that promote continuity of care in clinical settings.