Knowledge Panel Entity Aggregation for Search Results

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional search systems fail to effectively present relevant information to users by requiring them to navigate through multiple search results to gather information about a specific entity, leading to inefficiencies in information retrieval.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of knowledge panels that provide a summary of information related to a particular entity, including content from multiple disparate sources, which are determined to be relevant based on topicality scores and click-through rates, and are displayed alongside search results to enhance user experience.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If users navigate through multiple search results to gather information about a specific entity, then they can access comprehensive information, but the information retrieval process becomes time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidinformation retrieval time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-assembling knowledge panels with comprehensive entity information before the user needs it. The knowledge panel is prepared in advance using content from multiple sources, so when the user searches for an entity, the information is already organized and ready for immediate display, eliminating the need to navigate through multiple results to gather information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The knowledge panel serves as an intermediary element between the search query and the comprehensive information about the entity. Instead of requiring users to directly access multiple search results, the knowledge panel acts as a mediator that consolidates and presents the essential information from various sources in a single, organized interface, thereby reducing information retrieval time while maintaining completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the search system displays only a list of search results, then the interface remains simple, but users must manually navigate through multiple results to find relevant information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser navigation easeVSAvoidsearch interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the knowledge panel with the search results interface, combining comprehensive entity information presentation with the existing search functionality. The knowledge panel is integrated into the search results page, allowing users to access detailed information about entities without leaving the search interface, thereby improving ease of operation while adding minimal complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The search interface is segmented into distinct functional components: the knowledge panel for comprehensive entity information and the search results list for additional resources. This segmentation allows users to access detailed information through the knowledge panel while maintaining the ability to explore further through the search results, improving ease of operation without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of information

If the system aggregates content from multiple disparate sources for the knowledge panel, then information comprehensiveness is improved, but the complexity of determining relevance and organizing content increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation comprehensivenessVSAvoidcontent aggregation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter changes by calculating topicality scores as a quantitative measure to determine the relevance of content from different sources. By transforming the complex task of content relevance determination into a measurable parameter (topicality score), the system can automatically aggregate and organize content from multiple sources based on objective criteria, reducing the subjective complexity of content curation while maintaining comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where click-through rates and user interactions with search results are used to refine and adjust the knowledge panel content and topicality scores. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user behavior and improve its content aggregation and organization over time, reducing the complexity of relevance determination through data-driven optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12130827B1Triggering knowledge panels
Publication Date: 2024.10.29 GOOGLE LLC
  • US12130827B1 patent drawing
  • US12130827B1 patent drawing
  • US12130827B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on a computer storage medium, for providing knowledge panels with search results. In one aspect, a method includes receiving a query. Search results that are responsive to the query are obtained. A first set of factual entities referenced by the query are identified. A particular factual entity is selected from the first set. It is determined that a knowledge panel for the particular factual entity is to be provided with the search results based, at least in part, on content of the knowledge panel and characteristics of the search results. The knowledge panel can include at least one content item, for the selected factual entity, received from a first resource and at least one content item, for the selected factual entity, received from a second resource different than the first resource. The knowledge panel is provided.