Knowledge Representation Concept Disambiguation for Relevant Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing information retrieval systems struggle to identify and present relevant information to users without overwhelming them with irrelevant content, especially when dealing with vast amounts of digital data across various networks.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize knowledge representations (KRs) to decompose and disambiguate user context information into multiple portions, identifying concepts associated with specific meanings using graph analysis and semantic coherence measures to select relevant digital content.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If search engines retrieve and index large numbers of web pages to provide comprehensive information, then the quantity of available information increases, but the difficulty of locating relevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of informationVSAvoiddifficulty of locating relevant information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the information retrieval process into multiple stages: initial broad retrieval using simple keywords, followed by progressive filtering and refinement using user context information, knowledge representations, and semantic analysis. This segmentation allows the system to handle large volumes of information by processing it in manageable steps, first expanding the search scope and then progressively narrowing it down to relevant results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces knowledge representations (KRs) as intermediary structures that mediate between raw search queries and the vast database of indexed web pages. These KRs serve as an intermediate layer that organizes and pre-processes information, allowing the system to efficiently match user context with relevant content without having to manually review every page, thus reducing the difficulty of locating relevant information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the system provides comprehensive search results to ensure completeness, then information completeness improves, but user overload with irrelevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation completenessVSAvoidirrelevant information overload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by tailoring search results to individual users based on their specific context information, preferences, and historical data. Instead of providing a uniform comprehensive list to all users, the system customizes the information presentation for each user, ensuring relevance while maintaining completeness for that specific user's needs. This selective completeness reduces irrelevant information overload by filtering out content that doesn't match the user's profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes retrieval parameters based on user context information, knowledge representations, and semantic analysis results. By adjusting parameters such as relevance thresholds, result ordering, and filtering criteria in response to user behavior patterns and contextual data, the system maintains information completeness while adapting to reduce irrelevant content, thereby preventing user overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system uses complex analysis methods to improve relevance accuracy, then information relevance improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-processing and organizing information into knowledge representations before actual search queries are processed. The system pre-establishes semantic relationships, categorizes content, and prepares contextual data structures in advance. This preliminary organization reduces the computational complexity during actual search operations, as the heavy lifting of analysis has already been performed, thereby achieving high relevance accuracy without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified copies or abstract representations of complex information structures through knowledge representations. Instead of working with the full complexity of raw web pages and their interrelationships during search, the system uses condensed KR copies that capture essential semantic meaning. This copying approach maintains relevance accuracy by preserving critical information relationships while significantly reducing the computational complexity of analysis operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250322267A1Methods and apparatus for identifying concepts corresponding to input information
Publication Date: 2025.10.16 PRIMAL FUSION INC
  • US20250322267A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322267A1 patent drawing
  • US20250322267A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for use in identifying one or more concepts in a knowledge representation (KR). The techniques include obtaining user context information associated with a user, wherein the user context information comprises a plurality of words. Also included are semantic disambiguation techniques comprising obtaining user context information associated with a user, wherein the user context information comprises a first portion and a second portion different from the first portion; and disambiguating between a first and second concept in a knowledge representation (KR) associated with a first meaning of the first portion. Semantic disambiguation techniques further include obtaining user context information associated with a user, wherein the user context information comprises a first portion and a second portion different from the first portion; and disambiguating between a first concept and second concept in a knowledge representation (KR) using a measures of dominance and semantic coherence. Additionally, techniques are disclosed for calculating a measure of semantic coherence based on a graph of a knowledge representation (KR) and, an overlap of semantic context of a first concept and a second concept in the KR.