Knowledge Sharing System with Segmented Repositories and Reward Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing knowledge management systems fail to effectively share knowledge within a trust-based relationship, as they do not account for human bias against sharing information outside of established trust contexts, leading to underutilization of central repositories and overemphasis on centralized data storage.

Innovation Solution

A multi-domain framework that includes a central knowledge repository and distributed user-specific repositories, allowing knowledge owners to manage and share information privately while enabling direct access and brokering, with a reward mechanism to incentivize sharing within trust-based relationships.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a central knowledge repository is established to manage and store organizational knowledge, then knowledge accessibility and centralization are improved, but user willingness to share knowledge decreases due to lack of trust-based relationships

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge accessibilityVSAvoidknowledge sharing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the knowledge repository into personal spaces where users maintain control over their knowledge assets. Each user has a dedicated repository that they can selectively share, rather than contributing to a monolithic central repository. This segmentation preserves trust-based relationships while enabling organized knowledge access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary mechanism that facilitates knowledge exchange between users based on their trust relationships. The intermediary matches knowledge requests with appropriate users while respecting privacy settings and trust boundaries, enabling knowledge sharing without requiring direct trust between all parties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If users are required to voluntarily contribute knowledge to a central repository, then knowledge centralization is improved, but the effort and time required for maintenance increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge centralization efficiencyVSAvoidknowledge maintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Users manage their own knowledge repositories autonomously, deciding what to share and with whom. The system provides self-service capabilities including automatic knowledge tagging, selective sharing based on user profiles, and automated matching with knowledge requests. This eliminates the need for manual contribution to a central repository while maintaining knowledge availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically organizing and indexing user knowledge before it is requested. Knowledge is pre-tagged and categorized based on user-defined preferences and system analysis, so that when knowledge requests arise, the system can quickly retrieve and present relevant information without requiring users to manually search or contribute at the moment of need.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If a reward system is implemented to incentivize knowledge sharing, then knowledge contribution frequency is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveknowledge contribution frequencyVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that automatically track and recognize knowledge sharing activities. Users receive immediate feedback in the form of reputation scores, visibility enhancements, and automated acknowledgments when their knowledge is accessed or utilized. This feedback loop naturally incentivizes continued sharing without requiring complex external reward management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The reward system is integrated into the core knowledge management functionality rather than being a separate mechanism. The same infrastructure that manages knowledge storage, retrieval, and sharing also handles reward tracking and recognition. User profiles that organize knowledge also track contribution metrics, eliminating the need for separate reward management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7831580B2Owner-brokered knowledge sharing machine
Publication Date: 2010.11.09 PANDESA CORP
  • US7831580B2 patent drawing
  • US7831580B2 patent drawing
  • US7831580B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention discloses a system and method for promoting information or knowledge sharing among users registered to a computer network by allowing an information or knowledge owner to locate or directly access private information, to publish information for direct access by knowledge requesters, or to broker information or knowledge with an information or knowledge requester. This invention also discloses a system and method which allow an organization to develop and manage a reward system based on the frequency of an information or knowledge owner's contribution to information or knowledge sharing and the frequency of an information or knowledge requestor's use of shared knowledge.