KPI-Driven Task Prioritization Across Device-Specific Interfaces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Employees lack guidance on determining the most impactful tasks to perform, leading to wasted time and resources on low-priority tasks while neglecting crucial maintenance, resulting in increased costs and reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

An interaction and notification system (INS) that generates and prioritizes tasks based on key performance indicators (KPIs), providing users with device-specific interfaces and notifications to ensure timely maintenance and task completion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If employees perform tasks without guidance on priority, then they have autonomy in task selection, but productivity decreases due to performing low-impact tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemployee productivityVSAvoidtime wasted on low-priority tasks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors equipment status, task completion, and performance metrics, then provides real-time feedback to employees through prioritized task lists. This feedback loop enables employees to understand which tasks have the highest impact on company goals and adjust their work accordingly, resolving the contradiction between autonomy and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and prioritizes tasks before employees need to perform them, using algorithms that analyze company goals, equipment status, and historical data. This preliminary action provides employees with a ready-made prioritized task list, eliminating the need for them to spend time determining task priority and ensuring they focus on high-impact work from the start of their shift.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If employees work without task prioritization guidance, then they can independently manage their workload, but resource allocation becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompany efficiencyVSAvoidresource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback on resource consumption patterns and task efficiency, enabling the organization to optimize resource allocation. By monitoring which tasks yield the highest returns and which resources are being wasted, the system can dynamically adjust task prioritization and resource distribution to maximize overall efficiency and minimize waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes task priority parameters based on real-time conditions such as equipment status, company goals, and resource availability. This parameter adjustment ensures that resources are always allocated to the most impactful tasks, preventing waste while maintaining efficient operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If equipment maintenance is not monitored, then operational flexibility is maintained, but costly repairs and downtime occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance monitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables equipment to effectively monitor and report its own maintenance needs through integrated sensors and diagnostics. Equipment automatically generates maintenance alerts and task assignments when maintenance is required, eliminating the need for complex manual monitoring systems while ensuring timely maintenance and preventing costly repairs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If a comprehensive task management system is implemented, then task prioritization improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidnotification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is designed to be universally applicable across different companies, industries, and equipment types through configurable parameters and standardized interfaces. By creating a multi-functional platform that can adapt to various organizational needs rather than building custom complex systems for each case, the solution improves task completion efficiency while keeping system complexity manageable through reuse of proven components and configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12524725B2Device-based productivity system
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • US12524725B2 patent drawing
  • US12524725B2 patent drawing
  • US12524725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are various embodiments for a device-based productivity system. An embodiment operates by determining a device type of a device corresponding to an account logged in through the device. A highest priority key performance indicator of a plurality of key performance indicators associated with the account is identified, each key performance indicator being linked with one or more actions that increases a value of the respective key performance indicator upon performance. An action associated with the highest priority key performance indicator that is actionable from the device of the determined device type based on a filter of the one or more actions corresponding to the highest priority key performance indicator is identified. The action is provided for display on a user interface on the device.