Pharmacometabolomics Biomarkers for L-Carnitine Response Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current treatments for sepsis face challenges in diagnosis, delayed recognition of organ dysfunction, and a poorly characterized biological phenotype, limiting the ability to select patients who will benefit from specific treatments and titrate dosing appropriately, leading to compromised patient outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A pharmacometabolomics strategy that uses metabolite levels in patient samples to identify sepsis patients likely to respond to L-carnitine treatment, employing biomarkers such as ketone bodies, acetylcarnitine, and the acetylcarnitine:carnitine ratio to differentiate 'carnitine responders' from 'non-responders', enabling personalized therapy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing diagnostic technologies and general sepsis treatments are used, then standard care can be provided to all patients, but patient outcomes are compromised due to inability to select patients who will benefit from specific treatments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepatient outcomesVSAvoidability to select patients for specific treatments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments sepsis patients into distinct metabolic phenotypes (e.g., high ketone bodies vs. low ketone bodies) based on metabolite level measurements. This segmentation allows clinicians to identify which patients are likely to respond to L-carnitine therapy versus those who are not, thereby improving treatment selection and outcomes without requiring a completely new diagnostic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the diagnostic parameter from general clinical assessment to specific metabolite level measurements (ketone bodies, acetylcarnitine, carnitine ratios). By measuring these metabolic parameters, the system can objectively identify patient subgroups with specific metabolic profiles that predict treatment response, enabling personalized therapy decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If pharmacogenomics approaches are used to predict drug response, then personalized treatment selection is attempted, but success is limited due to inconsistencies and limited understanding of biological indications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized treatment selectionVSAvoidprediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention substitutes pharmacogenomics (which relies on genetic variations and has limited predictive power for acute drug response) with pharmacometabolomics (which measures actual metabolic state). By measuring metabolite levels that directly reflect current metabolic dysfunction, the system provides more reliable and consistent prediction of L-carnitine response compared to genetic approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes from measuring genetic parameters (which are static and have limited correlation with acute drug response) to measuring metabolic parameters (ketone bodies, acetylcarnitine levels) that dynamically reflect the patient's current physiological state and predict treatment response more accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If L-carnitine treatment is administered to all sepsis patients, then potential benefit to all patients is maximized, but resources are wasted on patients unlikely to respond and adverse reactions may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidL-carnitine dosage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention performs preliminary metabolic phenotyping by measuring ketone bodies and acetylcarnitine levels before administering L-carnitine treatment. This preliminary assessment identifies patients who are likely to respond to therapy, allowing clinicians to pre-select appropriate candidates and avoid administering the drug to patients unlikely to benefit, thereby optimizing resource allocation and reducing waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If comprehensive metabolite measurement is performed to identify responders, then personalized treatment prediction is achieved, but diagnostic complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalized treatment predictionVSAvoiddiagnostic methodology
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and measures only the specific metabolites most relevant to L-carnitine response (ketone bodies, acetylcarnitine, and the acetylcarnitine:carnitine ratio) rather than performing comprehensive metabolite profiling. This focused approach achieves personalized treatment prediction by concentrating on the key metabolic indicators that have been shown to predict treatment response, thereby reducing diagnostic complexity while maintaining predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10330685B2Markers for sepsis treatment
Publication Date: 2019.06.25 THE RGT UNIV OF MICHIGAN
  • US10330685B2 patent drawing
  • US10330685B2 patent drawing
  • US10330685B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided herein is technology relating to treatment of sepsis and particularly, but not exclusively, to methods for predicting a response of a sepsis patient to treatment with L-carnitine.