L-Shaped Crib Wall Stretchers for Smooth Front Face

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing crib wall structures face inefficiencies in material usage, aesthetic issues due to exposed headers, and difficulties in achieving a smooth front face, particularly when made from timber or heavy concrete materials.

Innovation Solution

A crib wall structure using polymeric materials, specifically recycled plastics, with 'L', 'C', 'U', or 'T' shaped front end stretchers that interconnect with headers via pins and spacer blocks, allowing for efficient manufacturing, reduced material usage, and a smooth front face, while accommodating longitudinal expansion and aesthetic considerations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If headers extend beyond stretchers to both front and rear with notches, then strong structure is achieved, but effective depth of wall is reduced and material usage efficiency is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmaterial usage efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The stretcher is divided into two distinct portions: an upright portion that provides the vertical support and a rearward directed portion that extends backward to engage with the header. This segmentation allows each portion to fulfill its specific function efficiently, with the upright portion contributing to wall height and the rearward portion providing structural connection, thereby optimizing material usage while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The stretcher design transitions from a simple horizontal member to an L-shaped member with both vertical and horizontal components. By adding the vertical dimension through the upright portion, the structure achieves both the necessary connection function (through the rearward portion) and improved material efficiency (through the vertical orientation that contributes to wall height without requiring additional header extension).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If headers are made from swan timber, then structural requirements are met, but aesthetic appeal is reduced and additional finishing processes are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural performanceVSAvoidaesthetic finish requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The material parameter is changed from natural timber to molded plastic, which inherently provides a smooth, uniform surface finish without the grain patterns and irregularities of timber. This material substitution eliminates the need for additional aesthetic finishing processes like painting or staining, while still achieving the required structural performance through appropriate design and connection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If notches are cut in headers, then stretcher connection is enabled, but height of each course is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection capabilityVSAvoidcourse height
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of cutting material away from the header (which would reduce its height), the connection mechanism is inverted: the stretcher itself is designed with a rearward directed portion that actively engages with the header. This approach maintains the full height of both components while achieving secure connection, effectively reversing the traditional approach where the header was modified to accommodate the stretcher.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Strength

If front ends of headers are exposed, then structural function is fulfilled, but visual appearance is compromised and smooth front face cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural functionVSAvoidfront face smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The functional requirement of header exposure is extracted and relocated: the header's connection function is maintained through the rearward directed portion of the stretcher engaging with it, but the header itself is taken out of the visible front face area. The upright portion of the stretcher now occupies the front position, providing both the necessary structural support and a smooth, continuous front surface that eliminates visual discontinuities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentEP3613904B1Crib wall structure
Publication Date: 2023.10.04 KELLER HOLDING GMBH
  • EP3613904B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3613904B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3613904B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A crib wall structure (12) includes a plurality of tiers of stretchers (14a, 14b) and headers (16) arranged for containing an in-fill material to form a crib wall. The stretchers (14a, 14b) are aligned longitudinally of the wall whilst the headers (16) are aligned perpendicular to the stretchers and arranged in a plurality of columns (18) spaced apart along the length of the wall. At the front face, front end stretchers (14a) span lengthways to interconnect front end regions of associated headers in adjacent columns in a tier. In an embodiment, the front end stretchers (14a) have a generally upright portion (22) and at least one rearward directed portion (24) and may be substantially 'L' shaped. The stretchers and headers may be extruded from recycled plastics and interconnected by means of pins. The front end stretchers (14a) may be arranged in a 'checkerboard' pattern with the front end stretchers in adjacent wall sections being off-set.