L-Shaped Faceplate Golf Club Head Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Golf club heads fail to optimize energy transfer and ball speed due to limited flexure and dynamic lofting characteristics, which affect launch characteristics and ball speed.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates an L-shaped faceplate with a sole return and a rear body, allowing for increased flexure and dynamic lofting, featuring a sole ledge to prevent weight pad interference and a weight pad positioned low in the club head to lower the center of gravity without sacrificing structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the faceplate is made thicker to increase structural integrity, then strength is improved, but flexure and dynamic lofting are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidflexure and dynamic lofting
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The faceplate employs variable thickness design where the strike face portion has greater thickness for structural integrity and weight pad support, while the sole return portion has reduced thickness to enable flexure. This local differentiation allows the faceplate to maintain strength where needed while providing the necessary flexibility for dynamic lofting during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The faceplate is divided into distinct functional segments: a strike face portion for supporting the weight pad and maintaining structural integrity, and a sole return portion for providing flexure and dynamic lofting. This segmentation allows each portion to be optimized for its specific function without compromising the other.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Stability of the object's composition

If the weight pad is positioned lower to reduce center of gravity, then stability is improved, but interference with faceplate flexure may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter of gravity positionVSAvoidfaceplate flexure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The weight pad is extracted from the traditional position and repositioned within the cavity of the sole return portion, separated from the strike face portion by the sole return structure. This spatial extraction allows the weight pad to be positioned low for stability while the sole return structure prevents interference with faceplate flexure during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The sole return portion acts as an intermediary structure between the weight pad and the strike face portion. It provides a cavity that accommodates the weight pad while maintaining physical separation, allowing the weight pad to be positioned low without directly interfering with the flexure of the strike face portion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Stability of the object's composition

If the faceplate is designed with reduced thickness to increase flexure, then dynamic lofting is improved, but structural integrity may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefaceplate flexureVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The faceplate employs variable thickness design where the strike face portion has greater thickness for structural integrity and weight pad support, while the sole return portion has reduced thickness to enable flexure. This local differentiation allows the faceplate to maintain strength where needed while providing the necessary flexibility for dynamic lofting during impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The club head utilizes composite construction with a hollow body formed from a first material (such as titanium or stainless steel) and a faceplate made from a second material (such as carbon fiber reinforced polymer or metal). This composite approach allows optimization of each material for its specific function: the hollow body provides structural integrity while the faceplate provides flexure and dynamic lofting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS20230390613A1Golf club head with l-shaped faceplate and weight pad
Publication Date: 2023.12.07 KARSTEN MFG CORP
  • US20230390613A1 patent drawing
  • US20230390613A1 patent drawing
  • US20230390613A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of an iron-type golf club head comprising an L-shaped faceplate configured for flexibility are described herein. The L-shaped faceplate comprises a strike face portion and a sole return that wraps around a leading edge of the golf club head. In some embodiments, the L-shaped faceplate further comprises a top rail extension and a toe extension that extend to the peripheries of the golf club head. The golf club head comprises a rear body configured to receive the L-shaped faceplate to form a hollow interior cavity. The rear body comprises a sole ledge configured to receive the sole return. In some embodiments, the golf club head further comprises a weight pad that overhangs a portion of the sole return. In some embodiments, the golf club head further comprises dynamic lofting features that increase the bending in the rear body.