Precast L-Wall Stormwater Detention System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current stormwater detention systems are labor-intensive, costly, and inefficient, with limited detention capacity, requiring extensive excavation, many pieces to install, and a large footprint, which can lead to premature repairs and safety issues.

Innovation Solution

The system employs precast and prestressed concrete elements, including L-wall, T-wall, and double-T members with pockets, arranged to form an outer wall and inner support structures, along with a roof, to create a more efficient and robust stormwater detention system with increased capacity and reduced installation time and land use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional precast modular systems (STORMPOD, STORMTRAP) are used, then stormwater detention capacity is provided, but the systems require extensive excavation, many precast units, and are very labor-intensive in manufacturing, shipping and installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestormwater detention capacityVSAvoidinstallation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detention structure into modular precast concrete elements (walls, floors, roofs, access chambers) that can be manufactured separately and assembled on-site. This segmentation enables parallel manufacturing and simplifies installation while maintaining detention capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple functions into integrated precast elements: structural support, water detention, and access points are merged into a unified modular system. The precast elements are designed to work together as a complete assembly, reducing the number of separate components needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If traditional precast modular systems are used, then stormwater detention is achieved, but the systems require extended time at the project site for excavation, drainage, sub-base, select subgrade material placement and installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetention functionVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Critical structural elements (walls, floors, roofs) are precast in advance at a manufacturing facility, allowing site preparation and element fabrication to occur simultaneously. This preliminary action eliminates waiting time during on-site assembly and reduces overall construction schedule.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Strength

If access chambers are limited in traditional systems, then structural integrity is maintained, but maintenance needs to be performed manually and poses maintenance issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural integrityVSAvoidmaintenance accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates built-in access chambers that enable maintenance personnel to enter and service internal components (pumps, screens, outlets) without external equipment. This self-service capability allows routine maintenance to be performed from within the structure, improving accessibility while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11155988B1Systems and methods for stormwater detention
Publication Date: 2021.10.26 SUMMIT PRECAST CONCRETE LP
  • US11155988B1 patent drawing
  • US11155988B1 patent drawing
  • US11155988B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for stormwater detention. An outer wall comprising L-wall members arranged side by side, each comprising a vertical stem having a height h and a width w, and a base of width w connected to the stem and extending outward therefrom at a horizontal angle. At least a first portion of the L-wall member stems having a pocket extending a distance d from a top surface of the stem towards the base, where d<h. The pockets may be positioned midway of the stem width. At least a second portion of the L-wall member stems devoid of a pocket. Optionally, support walls also having a pocket. A roof of double-T roof members each having a span, a flange, and two webs, the webs having first and second ends engaged with one of the pockets of the stems of the L-wall members.