L1 Execution Allocation Across Radio Resource Units Under Latency Constraints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication node technologies face challenges in achieving efficient hardware utilization, low power consumption, and meeting latency requirements while minimizing signaling over interfaces during L1 processing.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for controlling L1 execution in a communication node with multiple L1 execution instances, enabling/disabling instances based on traffic load, allocating non-overlapping parts of a radio resource unit to different instances, and sending control signals for efficient processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple L1 execution instances are used to increase processing capacity, then productivity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidnumber of execution instances
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically enables or disables L1 execution instances based on traffic load conditions. The controller monitors traffic load and activates additional instances when load increases, while disabling instances when load decreases, making the system adaptable to varying demands rather than statically configured

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple L1 execution instances share the same functional capabilities and can handle different parts of radio resource units. Each instance is capable of performing the same L1 processing functions, allowing flexible allocation of work across instances based on current system needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Speed

If more L1 execution instances are activated to meet latency requirements, then speed is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovelatencyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active L1 execution instances based on real-time traffic load and latency requirements. When latency requirements are stringent or traffic load is high, more instances are activated to provide parallel processing capacity. When requirements are relaxed, instances are deactivated to conserve power

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller changes the operational state parameter of L1 execution instances from active to inactive based on system conditions. This parameter change allows the system to transition between different power consumption levels while maintaining the capability to meet varying latency requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Use of energy by moving object

If L1 execution instances are dynamically enabled/disabled to optimize power consumption, then energy efficiency is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller implements a feedback mechanism that monitors traffic load conditions and uses this information to make informed decisions about enabling or disabling L1 execution instances. The system continuously observes system state and adjusts instance activation accordingly, creating a closed-loop control system that optimizes power consumption based on actual demand

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If multiple L1 execution instances are used to increase processing capacity, then productivity is improved, but signaling over interfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidsignaling amount
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the radio resource unit into non-overlapping parts and assigns different parts to different L1 execution instances for parallel processing. This segmentation allows multiple instances to work simultaneously on different portions of the same resource unit, increasing processing capacity while managing signaling requirements through structured division of work

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4000194B1Layer one execution control
Publication Date: 2026.01.07 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • EP4000194B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4000194B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

A method of controlling layer one, L1, execution for a communication node associated with two or more L1 execution instances is disclosed. The communication node is configured to communicate with one or more communication devices and to operate according to a communication scheme defining radio resource units representing indivisible communication units of a radio access interface of the communication node. The method comprises allocating respective L1 execution of at least two non-overlapping parts of a single radio resource unit to different ones of the two or more L1 execution instances. The method also comprises sending a respective control signal to the different ones of the two or more L1 execution instances, wherein each respective control signal is indicative of the corresponding part of the single radio resource unit. Corresponding apparatus, arrangement, communication node and computer program product are also disclosed.