L1/L2 Security Key Derivation for 5G Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems, particularly in 5G NR and LTE, face challenges in securely managing security key derivation during lower layer mobility handovers, which can lead to security vulnerabilities and inefficiencies in inter-cell handovers.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of techniques for security key derivation using lower layer signaling, such as downlink control information (DCI) and medium access control (MAC)-control elements, to dynamically select and manage physical cell identifiers (PCIs) for secure communication between base stations and user equipment, ensuring seamless handovers and maintaining security key consistency across associated cells.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional security key derivation methods are used during handover, then security management becomes complex and vulnerable, but implementing lower layer signaling-based key derivation increases system complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity managementVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the security key management into different layers: upper layer (RRC) handles initial key establishment while lower layer (L1/L2) handles dynamic key derivation during handover. This segmentation allows each layer to operate independently with simplified logic, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining security reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-configuring security parameters and key material in the lower layers before handover occurs. The UE and gNB prepare the necessary cryptographic materials in advance, enabling rapid key derivation during handover without complex real-time computations, thus reducing system complexity while ensuring security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If frequent security key updates are implemented during handover, then security is improved, but handover efficiency and system performance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidhandover efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by updating security keys at specific handover events rather than continuously. The lower layer derives new keys periodically when handover occurs, using event-triggered updates based on handover commands. This approach maintains security through regular key updates while avoiding the overhead of continuous key management, thus preserving handover efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables self-service by allowing the lower layers (L1/L2) to autonomously derive and manage security keys during handover without requiring constant upper layer intervention. The UE independently derives new keys using pre-configured parameters and handover command information, eliminating the need for frequent RRC reconfiguration messages and maintaining both security and handover efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Speed

If lower layer signaling is used for key derivation, then handover speed is improved, but security vulnerability increases due to potential key consistency issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandover speedVSAvoidkey consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the upper layer (RRC) monitors and verifies the security key derivation process in the lower layers. The gNB sends handover commands with explicit key derivation parameters, and the UE provides feedback through successful random access and uplink transmissions, ensuring key consistency is maintained while enabling fast L1/L2-based handover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by dynamically adjusting key derivation parameters (such as PCI, frequency information, and handover command identifiers) based on the specific handover scenario. These parameter variations ensure that each handover generates unique, consistent keys tailored to the target cell, maintaining security reliability while enabling rapid handover execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4176565B1Security key in layer 1 (L1) and layer 2 (L2) based mobility
Publication Date: 2024.08.21 QUALCOMM INC
  • EP4176565B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4176565B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4176565B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Certain aspects of the subject matter described in this disclosure can be implemented in a method for wireless communication by a user equipment (UE). The method generally includes receiving lower layer signaling indicating that the UE is to handover to one or more first physical cell identifiers (PCIs) to be used for communication between the UE and the BS and communicating with the BS in accordance with a security key and using the one or more first PCIs, the security key being associated with a PCI.