Expandable Left Atrial Appendage Implant for Secure Occlusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices for occluding the left atrial appendage in patients with atrial fibrillation are inadequate in providing a secure and effective seal, leading to potential thrombi formation and downstream complications such as stroke or heart attack.

Innovation Solution

An expandable framework with a first and second framework portion, configured to shift between collapsed and expanded configurations, featuring interconnected struts and anchoring members to securely anchor within the left atrial appendage, enhancing sealing and occlusion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a lattice structure with braided layers is used to occlude the left atrial appendage, then occlusion effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveocclusion effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework is divided into multiple discrete struts (first plurality and second plurality) that are interconnected to form the framework structure. These struts can be independently positioned and anchored, allowing for segmented deployment and adjustment to achieve effective occlusion while managing device complexity through modular construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The collapsible configuration allows the framework struts to be nested within each other during delivery, with the first and second plurality of struts arranged in a compact, space-efficient manner within the delivery catheter. Upon deployment, the struts expand outward to form the occlusive structure, transitioning from a compressed nested state to an expanded functional state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If anchoring members are added to the framework, then anchoring security is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanchoring securityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anchoring members are integrated directly into the framework structure, with struts serving dual functions as both structural support elements and anchoring components. The interconnection between struts and anchoring members creates a unified structure that provides secure anchoring without requiring separate, independent anchoring devices

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Anchoring members are strategically positioned at specific locations on the framework struts where they can engage with the left atrial appendage tissue. The anchoring function is localized to specific regions of the device rather than distributed uniformly, optimizing anchoring security at critical interface points while maintaining overall structural integrity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If the framework is made expandable between collapsed and expanded configurations, then delivery ease is improved, but structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery easeVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The framework is designed with dynamic characteristics, transitioning from a collapsed low-profile configuration during delivery to an expanded functional configuration upon deployment. This dynamic transformation allows the device to adapt its shape and size according to the procedural requirements, facilitating easy delivery through the catheter while providing the necessary structural complexity for effective occlusion when deployed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The framework structure employs asymmetric design elements in the arrangement and configuration of struts, allowing for optimized collapse and expansion mechanics. The asymmetric positioning of struts and connection points enables controlled deformation during deployment while maintaining structural integrity, reducing the complexity of symmetric mechanisms that would be required for balanced expansion

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentEP4294286B1Left atrial appendage implant
Publication Date: 2025.11.19 BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED INC
  • EP4294286B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4294286B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4294286B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An implant for occluding a left atrial appendage may include an expandable framework including a first framework portion and a second framework portion, wherein the expandable framework is configured to shift along a longitudinal axis between a collapsed configuration and an expanded configuration. The second framework portion may be disposed radially inward of the first framework portion in the collapsed configuration. The expandable framework includes a proximal hub and a distal hub. The first framework portion may be fixedly attached to the proximal hub and the distal hub. The second framework portion may be fixedly attached to the proximal hub and the distal hub.