Laboratory Deck Verification Using Imaging Feedback for Labware Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual deck setup in laboratory workstations is prone to human errors, leading to unsuccessful automated processes, material waste, and equipment damage.

Innovation Solution

A laboratory workstation equipped with a display device for instructions, an imaging device for monitoring, and a processor for verifying the arrangement of labware using artificial neural networks, template matching, and image comparison to ensure accurate setup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual deck setup is performed by laboratory technician, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but human errors increase leading to unsuccessful automated processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck setup accuracyVSAvoidmanual operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures images of the deck setup and provides real-time feedback to the operator through an imaging device and display interface. The processor compares the captured image with the expected protocol configuration and indicates whether each component is correctly placed, allowing immediate correction of errors before the automated process begins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-verification of deck setup by automatically capturing images, processing them through neural networks or template matching algorithms, and generating verification reports without requiring external inspection. The workstation independently checks its own configuration against the programmed protocol requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If automated verification systems are implemented, then deck setup accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeck setup verificationVSAvoidsystem component count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The imaging device serves multiple functions: capturing deck setup images, identifying components through image processing, verifying configuration against protocols, and providing visual feedback to operators. The display interface also displays instructions and status information, consolidating multiple system functions into integrated components that reduce overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual visual inspection and physical verification methods with automated image capture and digital processing. Instead of requiring operators to manually check each component's position and configuration, the imaging device and processor automatically perform verification through optical recognition and algorithmic comparison with expected configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Loss of time

If real-time image processing is performed during deck setup, then error detection speed increases, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection timeVSAvoidprocessor computational load
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs image processing at selective stages rather than continuously monitoring every movement. It captures images at key verification points in the deck setup process and processes them accordingly, performing partial verification actions that are sufficient to detect errors without the excessive computational burden of continuous full-frame analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses disposable or temporary image data structures and processing models that are created only when needed for verification and then discarded. Instead of maintaining permanent complex data structures or continuously running computational models, the system generates temporary processing artifacts that serve the immediate verification need and are then eliminated, reducing overall computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS20260104433A1Systems and methods for laboratory deck setup verification
Publication Date: 2026.04.16 BECKMAN COULTER INC
  • US20260104433A1 patent drawing
  • US20260104433A1 patent drawing
  • US20260104433A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A laboratory workstation for preparing a sample according to a programmed protocol. The laboratory workstation may include a display device configured to display an instruction for loading a first item of labware onto a deck of the laboratory workstation at a position on the deck specified by the programmed protocol; an imaging device configured to monitor the deck of the laboratory workstation by creating one or more images of the deck; and a processor configured to recognize, in the one or more images created by the imaging device, an item of labware loaded onto the deck by an operator. In some embodiments, the processor may be configured to indicate on the display device whether the recognized item of labware loaded by the operator is arranged on the deck in accordance with the programmed protocol.