Laboratory Test History Modeling with Denoise-Balance Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Clinical laboratories face challenges in integrating and interpreting large volumes of laboratory data for accurate diagnostic insights, as human intuition is unreliable and conventional statistical approaches are limited, often missing key results or patterns, leading to inefficient diagnosis and management.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using a denoise-balance scheme to preprocess datasets, comprising index, test code, and feature filters, followed by training a machine learning model with an ensemble method to predict clinical diagnostic test results, enhancing accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If manual interpretation of laboratory test results is used, then clinicians can integrate test results with clinical data and medical knowledge, but key results or patterns are easily overlooked due to human limitations in processing extensive data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey results or patternsVSAvoiddata processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces computational approaches as an intermediary between laboratory test results and clinician interpretation. Machine learning models process hundreds or thousands of individual test results, extracting patterns and trends that would be difficult for clinicians to identify manually, while presenting synthesized insights rather than raw data volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of clinician data review with automated computational systems. Machine learning algorithms systematically analyze laboratory data, eliminating human cognitive limitations in processing extensive datasets while maintaining diagnostic relevance through trained prediction models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If computational approaches are used to analyze laboratory data, then diagnostic value is enhanced, but data processing complexity and model training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic valueVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex computational task into distinct components: data preprocessing modules that clean and organize laboratory data, feature engineering steps that identify relevant predictors, and machine learning model training phases. This segmentation manages complexity by breaking down the overall system into manageable, specialized subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary data preprocessing and feature selection before model training. The system pre-processes laboratory data to ensure quality, selects relevant features in advance, and prepares training datasets, thereby reducing the computational burden during actual model training and deployment phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained on extensive historical data, then prediction accuracy improves, but training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodel training time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes irrelevant or redundant features from the extensive historical laboratory data before training. By identifying and eliminating non-informative data elements, the system reduces the dimensionality of training datasets while preserving the signal needed for accurate predictions, thereby decreasing training time without sacrificing accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes model training parameters such as learning rates, batch sizes, and epoch counts based on the specific characteristics of laboratory data. These parameter adjustments enable efficient training on extensive historical datasets by balancing convergence speed with prediction accuracy, reducing overall training time while maintaining model performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12626189B2Predicting a diagnostic test result from patient laboratory testing history
Publication Date: 2026.05.12 LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS INC
  • US12626189B2 patent drawing
  • US12626189B2 patent drawing
  • US12626189B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to techniques for preprocessing samples and using preprocessed samples and machine learning models to predict clinical diagnostic tests for a patient from their historical laboratory testing data. Particularly, aspects are directed to obtaining datasets including features and/or historical laboratory test results for subjects, filtering the datasets based on a denoise-balance scheme to obtain filtered datasets, training a machine learning model using the filtered datasets to obtain a trained machine learning model, and providing the trained machine learning model. A candidate machine learning model may be an ensemble of classifiers implemented with a boosting algorithm, and the ensemble is trained by applying base machine learning algorithms on different distributions of the filtered datasets. The ensemble is then combined into a machine learning model having the set of learned model parameters for predicting results for clinical diagnostic tests.