Lab Measurement Unit Validation Using Reference Health Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Lab test data often exhibits inconsistencies due to missing or mislabeled measurement units, leading to misdiagnoses, ineffective treatments, and misleading research outcomes, compromising patient safety and hindering medical advancements.

Innovation Solution

A data integrity maintenance system filters healthcare data based on common health-related attributes, generates a reference measurement range, and determines the correct measurement unit for lab test data that lack units or exhibit mislabeling errors, improving data quality and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated data processing is implemented without validation, then processing speed increases, but data accuracy deteriorates due to missing or mislabeled measurement units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing speedVSAvoidmeasurement unit accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of measurement units before main data processing occurs. By checking and correcting measurement units in advance (steps 304-308), the system prevents errors from propagating through the processing pipeline, thereby maintaining both high processing speed and data accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation layer between raw data input and processing operations. This intermediate step (steps 302-312) acts as a mediator that verifies measurement units against reference ranges and corrects errors without requiring manual intervention, thus preserving processing efficiency while improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive data validation is performed on all healthcare data, then data accuracy improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies validation selectively rather than uniformly across all data. It focuses computational resources on specific fields that require verification (steps 304-308), such as measurement units that lack values or contain errors, while skipping already-validated data. This localized approach maintains data accuracy while reducing overall computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the validation parameter from comprehensive checking of all data points to targeted checking based on error indicators. By monitoring parameters like missing measurement units or values outside reference ranges (steps 310-312), the system dynamically adjusts validation intensity, consuming computational resources only when anomalies are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual verification of measurement units is performed, then data accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement unit accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service validation where the data processing system automatically verifies and corrects its own measurement units without requiring manual intervention. The automated validation logic (steps 304-312) compares measurement units against reference ranges and corrects errors autonomously, eliminating time loss associated with manual verification while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If data filtering based on health-related attributes is implemented, then data relevance improves, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata relevanceVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data processing task into distinct phases: filtering data by health-related attributes (step 302), validating measurement units (steps 304-308), and processing corrected data (step 312). This segmentation allows each phase to be optimized independently, improving data relevance through targeted filtering while managing complexity through modular processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250372214A1Systems and methods for maintaining data integrity in a health analysis platform by assessing and modifying physiological measurements based on filtered healthcare data
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 MEDIDATA SOLUTIONS INC
  • US20250372214A1 patent drawing
  • US20250372214A1 patent drawing
  • US20250372214A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for maintaining data integrity in a computerized health analysis platform are disclosed. For instance, a method includes (i) filtering existing healthcare data by first determining or extracting a first subset of data of data sets, such that the first subset is focused on common health-related attribute(s), (ii) generating a reference measurement range from the extracted first subset, and (iii) determining, based on the reference measurement range, measurement unit for lab test data that lack measurement unit or exhibit mislabeling error. For instance, the first subset of data sets represents measurements of physiological parameter(s) of entities. For instance, the lab test data are different from the first subset or the existing healthcare data that is used to determine the first subset. After the measurement unit is determined, a data structure representing the measurement unit is generated and stored.