Laboratory System Validation Profiles for Multisite LIS
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In multisite laboratory environments, existing Laboratory Information Systems (LIS) face challenges in managing and validating test results due to the need for multiple configurations and varying validation criteria across different locations, leading to complexity in centralized control and increased risks of user error.
Innovation Solution
A laboratory system that utilizes a remote computer to define and assign profiles of validation criteria, allowing each laboratory to customize its validation criteria and perform automatic validation of analytical test results based on predefined groups, thereby reducing user error and increasing throughput.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If multiple configurations are created for each laboratory location with customized validation criteria, then validation accuracy and adaptability are improved, but system complexity and configuration management difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the validation criteria into modular templates that can be independently configured and reused across multiple laboratories. Each template represents a discrete validation rule that can be combined through profiling, allowing complex validation logic to be broken down into manageable, reusable components that reduce overall system complexity while maintaining high validation accuracy
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements template copying where validated validation criteria configurations are replicated across multiple laboratories through profile assignment. Instead of manually configuring each laboratory individually, administrators can create a template once and copy it to multiple locations with automatic adaptation, reducing configuration complexity while ensuring consistent validation accuracy across the network
2Adaptability or versatility
If manual validation processes are used with multiple configurations, then flexibility in handling different validation criteria is improved, but user error risk and processing time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements self-service automation where the system automatically selects and applies the appropriate validation template based on the laboratory profile and test type. The automated validation engine retrieves the correct template, applies the validation criteria, and processes results without manual intervention, eliminating user errors while maintaining the flexibility to handle diverse validation requirements through pre-configured templates
Solution Approach 2:
The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system automatically validates test results against the appropriate template criteria and provides real-time feedback on validation status. This automated feedback loop ensures consistent application of validation rules across all laboratories while reducing reliance on manual processes, thereby decreasing user error risk while preserving adaptability through configurable templates
3Stability of the object's composition
If centralized control is implemented across multiple laboratories, then system-wide consistency is improved, but control complexity and management overhead increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent creates universal validation templates that can be applied across multiple laboratories through profile assignment. A single template definition serves multiple functions by being reusable across different locations and test types, ensuring system-wide consistency without requiring separate configurations for each laboratory. This multi-functional approach simplifies centralized control while maintaining uniform validation standards across the entire network
4Manufacturing precision
If validation criteria are customized for each laboratory, then local validation quality is improved, but configuration creation time and system setup complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring validation templates with commonly used validation criteria before deployment. Administrators can prepare and validate template configurations in advance, then rapidly deploy them to multiple laboratories through profile assignment. This preliminary preparation ensures high validation quality while dramatically reducing the time required for configuration creation and deployment across the network
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2~4
Figure 5
AI summary
A laboratory system (100) is disclosed, wherein the laboratory system (100) comprises a plurality of laboratories (102) comprising one or more analytical instruments (104) for performing a plurality of analytical tests (T1-n) and providing analytical test results (TR1-n), and a remote computer (110) communicatively connected to the laboratories (102), wherein each of the laboratories (102) is configured to define test result validation criteria (C1-n) for validating at least one of the analytical test results (TR1-n) associated with the respective analytical tests (T1-n) of one of the plurality of laboratories (102), wherein the remote computer (110) is configured to define a plurality of profiles (P1-n) of validation criteria, to assign the profiles (P1-n) of test result validation criteria (C1-n) to one or more of the laboratories (102), and to perform an automatic validation of groups (G1-n) of the analytical test results (TR1-n) according to the profiles (P1-n) of test result validation criteria (C1-n).