Product Label Acceptability Analysis via Image Capture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack an efficient method to electronically indicate the acceptability of products, particularly in terms of freshness, authenticity, and environmental exposure, which can lead to the use of spoiled or counterfeit products.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an image capture and communication device that analyzes product labels with environmental monitors, authentication elements, and identification elements, transmitting data to a host server to generate an acceptability report, which includes authenticity verification and environmental history monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual inspection methods are used to determine product acceptability, then the system complexity is low, but the measurement precision and reliability of product quality assessment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct acceptability assessment accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an image capture and communication device that automatically captures images of product labels, environmental monitors, and authentication elements. The system then processes these images through coordinate extraction, element identification, and data validation to electronically determine product acceptability, substituting mechanical human inspection with automated electronic systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing system that acts as a mediator between the physical product label and the final acceptability determination. This intermediary system captures images, extracts coordinates, identifies label elements, validates data against databases, and generates acceptability reports, serving as a bridge that enhances measurement precision while managing system complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple label elements (environmental monitors, authentication elements, identification elements) are analyzed, then the reliability of product acceptability determination improves, but the device complexity and time required for analysis worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct acceptability determination reliabilityVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-defining coordinate ranges for different label elements (environmental monitors, authentication elements, identification elements) before the actual inspection process. This allows the system to quickly locate and analyze relevant elements without exhaustive searching, reducing analysis time while maintaining comprehensive multi-element verification for reliable acceptability determination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the product label analysis into distinct components: environmental monitors, authentication elements, and identification elements, each with predefined coordinate ranges. This segmentation allows the system to process each element type independently and efficiently, reducing overall analysis time while maintaining the reliability benefits of analyzing multiple elements simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data validation against host server is performed, then the authenticity verification improves, but the loss of time and device complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity verification accuracyVSAvoiddata validation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where extracted label data is transmitted to a host server for validation, and the server returns verification results. This feedback loop enables comprehensive authenticity verification by comparing extracted coordinates and element data against authorized databases, improving measurement precision while managing time loss through efficient data transmission and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9811632B2Computing systems and methods for electronically indicating the acceptability of a product
Publication Date: 2017.11.07 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US9811632B2 patent drawing
  • US9811632B2 patent drawing
  • US9811632B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In part, the invention relates to computing systems and methods for electronically indicating the acceptability of a product. An image capture and communication device may analyze a product label that includes one or more monitors, authentication elements, and identification elements. The image capture and communication device may determine the type and features of the monitors, authentication elements, and identification elements. The image capture and communication device may transmit data based on the type and features to a host server, which may transmit data associated with the host product to the image capture and communication device in, inter alia, the form of an acceptability report.