Label Printer Cover Segmentation for Peel Mode Operability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional label printers face operability issues when switching between continuous and removal issuing modes, particularly in the continuous issuing mode, where the label paper needs to be inserted into a paper exit opening, making the process less user-friendly and increasing design and production costs due to asymmetric cover designs.

Innovation Solution

A label printer design featuring a printer body with a paper roll holder, a label printing unit, a platen roller, a cover that opens or closes, and a removal unit with a pivotally supported removal roller and sensors, allowing for separate operation of the removal unit and easy maintenance, and a detachable configuration that improves operability and balance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the cover is designed to open in a lateral direction to improve operability in removal issuing mode, then the operability is improved, but the balance of left and right portions deteriorates and the cover becomes difficult to open

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperability in removal issuing modeVSAvoidbalance of left and right portions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is divided into a main body portion and a detachable removal unit portion. The removal unit can be separated from the main cover body, allowing independent operation and maintenance of each component. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling improved operability in removal issuing mode without compromising the overall structural balance and ease of opening the main cover.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover transitions from a static, fixed structure to a dynamic, reconfigurable structure. The removal unit can be attached or detached based on operational needs, allowing the cover to adapt its configuration. This dynamic design enables improved operability when needed while maintaining structural balance during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the cover design is made asymmetric to accommodate removal unit, then the operability is improved, but the design and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveoperabilityVSAvoiddesign and production costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the cover into modular components (main body and removal unit), the design achieves operational improvements without requiring fully asymmetric manufacturing. The modular structure allows standardized production of individual components that can be assembled, reducing overall design and production complexity compared to a fully asymmetric monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The main cover body is designed with universal features that can accommodate both symmetric and asymmetric configurations. The standardized interface for the removal unit allows the same main body to work with different configurations, reducing the need for entirely different production lines and lowering manufacturing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the removal roller is pressed against the platen roller only after cover closure, then the operability is good in removal issuing mode, but the switching between modes becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperability in removal issuing modeVSAvoidswitching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The removal roller is integrated into a separate, detachable removal unit rather than being fixed to the main cover body. This segmentation allows the removal roller to be positioned and pressed against the platen roller independently, simplifying the switching mechanism. Users can attach the removal unit when needed and detach it otherwise, without complex mechanical switching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The removal unit transitions from a fixed state to a detachable state based on operational needs. This dynamic configuration allows the removal roller to be engaged or disengaged from the platen roller through simple attachment and detachment actions, rather than through complex mechanical switching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If the label paper is inserted into the paper exit opening for continuous issuing mode, then the continuous issuing function is achieved, but the operability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous issuing functionVSAvoidoperability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The cover is segmented into a main body and a removable unit, allowing users to detach the removal unit when using continuous issuing mode. This eliminates the need to insert label paper through a narrow exit opening, as the paper can be loaded directly into the paper roll holder with the removal unit detached, significantly improving operability while maintaining the continuous issuing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover configuration dynamically changes based on the issuing mode. When continuous issuing is needed, the removal unit is detached, creating an open loading path for paper insertion. When removal issuing is needed, the removal unit is attached, providing the necessary constraints. This dynamic reconfiguration simplifies the paper loading process for continuous mode without compromising the removal issuing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances operability in removal issuing mode by simplifying the switching process and reducing delicate operations, while maintaining easy maintenance and allowing for use in both issuing modes with improved design symmetry and reduced costs.

Implementation Method 1

a removal roller (21) that sends the paper strip in a second direction that is different from the first direction in such a way that the paper strip is being held between the removal roller (21) and the platen roller (16), and peels off the label from the paper strip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a platen roller (16) that sends the paper strip in a first direction after the paper strip passes through the print head

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

a label printing unit (12) that includes a print head to print a label that remains temporarily attached to a paper strip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation: Thermal Radiation

Data Source

PatentEP2907667B1Label printer having two different peel modes
Publication Date: 2016.09.14 SANEI ELECTRIC
  • EP2907667B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2907667B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2907667B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A label printer (1) is provided with a printer body (10) that includes a paper roll holder (11); a label printing unit (12) that includes a print head (26); a platen roller (16) that sends the paper strip (3) in a first direction after the paper strip (3) passes through the print head (26); a cover (13) that opens or closes the paper roll holder (11); and a removal unit (14) that peels off the label (4) from the paper strip (3). One end of the cover (13) is pivotally supported on the printer body (10) via a first rotation shaft (13a) that is parallel to a central axis of the paper roll (2). One end of a longitudinal side of the removal unit (14) is pivotally supported on the cover (13) via a second rotation shaft (14a) that is perpendicular to the first rotation shaft (13a). A locking mechanism (25) that engages with the cover (13) is provided at the other end of the longitudinal side of the removal unit (14).