Electronic Tracking Label Activation via Printer Cutter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic tracking systems lack the capability to provide wide-range sensors, multiple communications interfaces, and automatic switching between short-range and long-range tracking, leading to limited functionality and battery consumption issues.

Innovation Solution

A method for activating electronic tracking labels via label printing, which includes a flexible electronic circuit with a controller, power source, wireless communications interface, sensors, and an activation mechanism that switches from a hibernation state to an active state upon activation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If electronic tracking tags continuously consume battery power to provide tracking functionality, then tracking reliability is improved, but battery lifespan deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking reliabilityVSAvoidbattery lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking tag employs periodic action by switching between active tracking mode and low-power hibernation mode. The system activates sensors and communications only when needed (periodically) rather than continuously, thereby maintaining tracking reliability when required while significantly extending battery lifespan during idle periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking tag implements dynamics by automatically adjusting its operational state based on environmental conditions and tracking requirements. The system dynamically transitions between hibernation and active states, optimizing the balance between reliability and battery duration in response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Speed

If tracking tags remain in active state for immediate use, then response time is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by preparing for potential tracking needs through periodic wake-up cycles and pre-configured activation triggers. Environmental sensors continuously monitor conditions in low-power mode, and the system is pre-programmed to activate immediately when specific triggers occur, achieving fast response without continuous high-power operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking tag utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting its operational parameters (power state, sensor activation, communication frequency) based on environmental conditions and tracking demands. This allows the system to optimize the trade-off between response time and energy consumption by changing its operational parameters rather than maintaining a fixed state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensors and communication interfaces are integrated into tracking labels, then functionality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovefunctionalityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tracking label implements universality by integrating multiple sensors (temperature, humidity, shock, light) and communication interfaces (Bluetooth, cellular, GPS) into a single multi-functional device. This allows one tracking tag to serve multiple purposes and adapt to various tracking scenarios, improving versatility while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies merging by combining multiple previously separate components (sensors, processors, communication modules, power management) into a single integrated tracking label. This consolidation improves functionality and adaptability while reducing overall system complexity compared to using separate devices for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12236296B2Method for activating an electronic tracking label via label printing
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 FERRET SYSTEMS INC
  • US12236296B2 patent drawing
  • US12236296B2 patent drawing
  • US12236296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process for activating tracking labels of an item tracking system that uses a printer to activate labels as they are printed for use. Electronic tracking labels may have a removable portion that breaks an electrical circuit when removed; breaking the circuit activates the label. A printer with a label cutter may be used when labels are prepared for use, and the printer may be configured to cut off the removable portion of the label during label printing. This method automates label activation as part of the label preparation process. The printer may be programmed to position the boundary between the removable portion of the label and the rest of the label under the cutter, for example using knowledge of the label's layout. A printed, activated label output from the printer may be placed directly on an item to be tracked.