Label-Based Similarity Matrix Visualization for Data Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data measurement techniques fail to account for variations caused by factors unrelated to the original measurement purpose, such as measurer or measurement site, leading to degraded data quality and hindering accurate identification of target labels.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus and method that generates a similarity matrix, adjusts its order based on label information, and displays an evaluation screen image to visually represent data variation caused by specific labels, allowing for intuitive identification of data quality issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If data are measured and utilized without considering variation factors, then measurement simplicity is maintained, but data quality degrades due to variation from factors like measurer or measurement site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the data analysis process by creating separate similarity matrices for different factors (measurer, measurement site, time) and then combining them. This allows the system to account for multiple variation sources without requiring a completely complex new measurement system, as each factor is analyzed independently and then integrated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces similarity matrices as intermediary computational structures that mediate between raw measurement data and final quality assessment. These matrices serve as intermediate representations that capture relationships between samples while accounting for different variation factors, enabling systematic quality evaluation without direct complex measurement interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If traditional correlation analysis is used to display data similarity, then time-based variation is visible, but factors other than time (measurer, apparatus) cannot be analyzed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about variation factorsVSAvoidanalysis system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal similarity matrix framework that can analyze multiple types of factors (time, measurer, measurement site, apparatus) using the same computational approach. This multi-functional system allows the analysis of diverse variation sources without requiring separate specialized analysis tools for each factor type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends the analysis from traditional one-dimensional time-based correlation to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating additional factors (measurer, measurement site, apparatus) as separate dimensions. Each factor generates its own similarity matrix, allowing comprehensive variation analysis across multiple dimensions simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of information

If similarity matrices are generated for multiple factors, then comprehensive data variation analysis is achieved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata variation informationVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The computational workload is segmented by calculating similarity matrices for each factor independently (time, measurer, measurement site, apparatus) rather than computing a single complex matrix. This segmentation allows for more efficient computation and enables parallel processing of different factor analyses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system computes similarity matrices for all possible factor combinations, which may seem excessive, but this comprehensive approach actually simplifies the overall analysis by providing complete variation information upfront. The exhaustive computation avoids the need for iterative or approximation methods that could require more computational resources in the long run.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12462168B2Information processing apparatus, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium, and information processing method
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US12462168B2 patent drawing
  • US12462168B2 patent drawing
  • US12462168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus includes: the distance-matrix calculating unit generates, from a data set including samples, a similarity matrix having columns and rows arranged in accordance with an order of the arranged samples, and stores a similarity between a sample corresponding to one of the columns and a sample corresponding to one of the rows in a field specified by the one of the columns and the one of the rows; the order adjusting unit generates an adjusted similarity matrix by referring to label information indicating a result of labeling each of the samples with labels each having classes and adjusting the order in the similarity matrix so that the samples are arranged by each of the classes in a target label designating in the labels; the visualizing unit generates an evaluation screen image indicating each field of the adjusted similarity matrix in brightness corresponding to the similarity.