Labeling Control Module Ingredient Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Food labeling systems often fail to provide up-to-date and complete ingredient information, leading to potential allergic reactions in consumers due to outdated labels, omitted allergens, and printhead damage affecting print legibility, which can be life-threatening and violate legal requirements.

Innovation Solution

A control module for a labeling apparatus that verifies the most recent ingredient data by comparing local and remote storage, prevents printing if data is outdated, checks for printhead functionality, and ensures the printed information fits within the label area, highlighting allergens for consumer safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ingredient data is updated frequently to ensure accuracy, then consumer safety is improved, but data synchronization delays may cause outdated labels to be printed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveingredient data accuracyVSAvoiddata synchronization delay
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the control module continuously verifies ingredient data by comparing local storage with remote server data before printing labels. This feedback loop ensures that only verified, up-to-date ingredient information is printed, resolving the contradiction between frequent updates and synchronization delays by adding a verification step that prevents outdated data from being used.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control module performs preliminary verification of ingredient data before the printing process. By checking data validity in advance and preventing printing if data is outdated or unverifiable, the system ensures that only current ingredient information is printed, eliminating the risk of using synchronized-but-outdated data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If the label print area is increased to accommodate all ingredients, then information completeness is improved, but label size and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveingredient list completenessVSAvoidlabel print area
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs an excessive action by verifying that the complete ingredient list fits within the available label print area before authorizing printing. If verification fails, the system prevents printing rather than partially printing or truncating information. This ensures information completeness without necessarily increasing label size, as the verification step catches issues before they result in incomplete labels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If printhead damage is detected to prevent incomplete printing, then label legibility is improved, but printing productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel print legibilityVSAvoidlabel printing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control module performs preliminary detection of printhead functionality before the printing process. By checking whether the printhead is operational and capable of producing legible output in advance, the system prevents printing operations that would result in incomplete or illegible labels. This preliminary check ensures reliability without significantly impacting productivity, as defective printheads would ultimately require reprinting anyway.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If ingredient verification is performed before printing, then consumer safety is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveingredient information accuracyVSAvoidcontrol module complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The verification system uses a feedback mechanism where the control module checks ingredient data against multiple criteria (local storage match, remote server verification, print area sufficiency, printhead functionality) and only authorizes printing when all checks pass. This structured feedback approach manages complexity by organizing verification into discrete, manageable steps rather than a single complex process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11905064B2Labelling apparatus control
Publication Date: 2024.02.20 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • US11905064B2 patent drawing
  • US11905064B2 patent drawing
  • US11905064B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control module for a labelling apparatus, including: an input configured to receive a label generation request indicating a food item to be labelled; an output configured to provide a print signal to a label printing device; and a processor configured to: identify a set of ingredients of the indicated food item in response to receipt of the label generation request; and verify that the identified set of ingredients of the food item is a most recent set of ingredients of the food item. If the identified set of ingredients of the food item is verified as the most recent, the print signal is output to cause the label printing device to print an information label indicating the set of ingredients of the food item. If the identified set of ingredients cannot be verified as the most recent set of ingredients, provision of the print signal is prevented.