Automated Labeling Device for Microscope Slides and Tissue Cassettes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing labeling devices are cumbersome and difficult to adapt for small objects like microscope slides and tissue cassettes, requiring manual operation and prone to errors and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

An automated labeling device that includes a sensor to ensure correct object positioning, a transport mechanism using rollers or a movable arm to move objects to a labeling position, and a stretching device to manage the liner, allowing for precise and efficient application of labels onto small objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual labeling is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling speedVSAvoidmachine complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The labeling device is divided into separate functional modules: a labeling head for applying labels, a transport mechanism for moving objects, and a control system. This segmentation allows each module to perform its specific function efficiently while keeping the overall system manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The labeling device is designed to handle multiple types of small objects (microscope slides, tissue cassettes, etc.) using the same basic mechanism. The universal design enables the device to maintain high productivity across different applications without requiring completely different systems for each object type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If automated labeling is implemented, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling speedVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The labeling device incorporates automatic object detection and positioning systems that eliminate the need for manual intervention. Objects are automatically fed, positioned, and labeled by the machine itself, maintaining high productivity while the control system manages complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with automated mechanisms including motorized transport systems, automated label application heads, and electronic control systems. This substitution increases productivity while consolidating control functions to manage overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If labeling device is designed for small objects, then adaptability improves, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with small objectsVSAvoidalignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The labeling device incorporates specialized components designed specifically for small objects, such as miniature labeling heads and precision positioning mechanisms. These local adaptations enable the device to handle various small objects effectively while maintaining the required alignment precision through dedicated design features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The device employs adjustable and adaptable mechanisms that can dynamically adjust to different object sizes and shapes. This includes variable positioning systems and flexible labeling heads that maintain precise alignment across different object types without requiring complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If manual labeling is used, then ease of operation is maintained, but reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling accuracyVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The labeling device incorporates sensors and control systems that provide feedback on object positioning, label application status, and system operation. This feedback mechanism ensures high reliability by detecting and correcting errors automatically while maintaining ease of operation through intuitive control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Manual labeling operations are replaced with automated labeling heads that precisely apply labels to objects. The automated system eliminates human error while maintaining ease of operation through simple loading and retrieval processes, with the control system handling the complex positioning and application tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2855286B1Method and device for application of a label to an object
Publication Date: 2019.08.14 ALEVAX
  • EP2855286B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2855286B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2855286B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A method and a device for application of a label to an object, comprising: moving the object from a storing position to a labeling position; back-feeding and printing a label arranged at a continuous liner; moving the liner across a peeling edge, whereby the label is peeled off from the liner; transferring the label from the liner to the object; and removing the object from the labeling position to a removal position.