Laboratory Capper/Decapper Coupler With Sensor-Guided Ejection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container capping and decapping systems in laboratory environments are complex, unreliable, and inefficient in adapting to various container sizes and shapes, requiring labor-intensive manual operations and lacking sensor capabilities for precise positioning.

Innovation Solution

A bi-directional motor-driven coupler assembly with mechanically-biased splines and concentrically positioned ejector nut and ejector, controlled by sensors, allows for quick adaptation to different container configurations without complex linkages, enabling precise torque application and release.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex linkages and control systems are used to provide gripping force and mechanical dexterity, then the system can effectively grip and torque containers, but the device complexity increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes complex linkages and control systems from the capping/decapping mechanism, retaining only the essential threaded shaft and coupler assembly. The motor directly drives the threaded shaft without intermediate mechanical linkages, extracting unnecessary complexity while maintaining the core gripping and torquing functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The coupler assembly is designed as a universal interface that can accommodate various container sizes and configurations through simple sensor feedback and control adjustments, rather than requiring complex mechanical adaptors or linkages for each container type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If elongated fingers are used as guides to prevent misalignment, then alignment between splines and receiving bore is achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical alignment guides (elongated fingers) with a sensor-based detection system. Sensors monitor the position and alignment of the coupler assembly relative to the container, providing feedback for precise alignment without requiring complex mechanical guiding structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If manually operated systems are used for capping and decapping, then the system is simple in design, but labor intensity increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapping/decapping speedVSAvoidlabor intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the capping and decapping operations autonomously through motor-driven rotation of the threaded shaft, which automatically engages the coupler assembly with the container and applies the necessary torque. The sensor system monitors and controls the process without requiring manual intervention, making the system self-sufficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical operations are replaced with an automated motor-driven system controlled by sensors. The motor rotates the threaded shaft to drive the capping/decapping process, while sensors provide feedback for precise control, eliminating the need for manual labor while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If systems lack sensor capabilities for monitoring ejector assembly position, then the mechanical arrangement is simpler, but the precision and control of the operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition monitoring precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors are integrated into the coupler assembly to monitor the position of the ejector assembly and the rotational position of the coupler. This feedback is transmitted to the control system, which adjusts the motor operation to achieve precise positioning and torque application, ensuring accurate and repeatable capping/decapping operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system efficiently and reliably caps and decaps containers of varying sizes and shapes with minimal mechanical complexity, enhancing adaptability and reducing labor, while ensuring precise positioning and torque control.

Implementation Method 1

mechanically-biased splines that are actuated without any complex linkages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical biasing: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The coupler assembly is configured to engage with a cap or container via mechanically-biased splines that are actuated without any complex linkages, or operative connection to the motor or other powered components. The system employs an ejector nut and an ejector, both of which are concentrically positioned about the threaded shaft. The ejector nut translates along the shaft as a function of the shaft's rotation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThreading mechanism: Screw

Implementation Method 3

The sensors may include multiple optical, magnetic or mechanical means for monitoring one or more of the positions of the ejector nut and ejector along the threaded shaft and/or the rotational position of the coupler assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 4

The sensors may include multiple optical, magnetic or mechanical means for monitoring one or more of the positions of the ejector nut and ejector along the threaded shaft and/or the rotational position of the coupler assembly

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic detection: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP3781513B1Capper/decapper system and method
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 BD KIESTRA BV
  • EP3781513B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3781513B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3781513B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D

AI summary

A system and method for gripping, torqueing and releasing an element so as to cap and/or decap a container, such as those typically utilized to house specimens in laboratory environments. The system is driven by a single bi-directional motor linked to a coupler assembly via a rotating threaded shaft. The coupler assembly is configured to engage with an element, such as a cap or container, via mechanically-biased splines that are actuated without any complex linkages, or operative connection to the motor or other powered components. The system employs an ejector nut and an ejector, both of which are concentrically positioned about the threaded shaft. The ejector nut translates along the shaft as a function of the shaft's rotation, so as to permit the retraction of the ejector when an element is engaged in the coupler assembly or cause the ejector to extend into the coupler assembly to disengage the element. The direction and rotation of the motor is controlled by a system coupled to sensors positioned within the system. Such control system may include one or more processors, component interfaces, and data storage/memory. The sensors may include multiple optical, magnetic or mechanical means for monitoring one or more of the positions of the ejector nut and ejector along the threaded shaft, and/or the rotational position of the coupler assembly.