System and approach for validating conditions of a space
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
There is a need for an efficient and validated system to verify and control the conditions of clean or laboratory spaces, ensuring they operate as per designed specifications, particularly in critical environments where precise temperature and airflow management are crucial.
Innovation Solution
A web-based lab verification tool built on the Niagara framework, allowing users to create and edit tasks, select test zones, read flow values, set up thermostats, perform visual checks, and generate reports, enabling full heating, cooling, and airflow condition testing, with a user interface that includes a create/open task screen, select test zone screen, read flow screen, hood/booster screen, T-stat setup screen, visual checks screen, and report screen.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If manual verification methods are used for laboratory space conditions, then flexibility in testing different parameters is maintained, but time consumption and human error increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system enables automatic self-verification of laboratory conditions through programmable test sequences that automatically control equipment, collect data, and generate reports without continuous human intervention, improving both efficiency and reliability
Solution Approach 2:
Manual verification processes are replaced with an automated computer-controlled system that uses software to manage test sequences, control laboratory equipment, and analyze results, eliminating human error and increasing verification speed
2Reliability
If comprehensive testing of all room conditions is performed, then verification completeness is improved, but system complexity and testing time increase
Solution Approach 1:
The verification process is divided into modular test sequences that can be independently configured and executed, allowing comprehensive testing to be broken down into manageable segments covering different laboratory conditions and parameters
Solution Approach 2:
The system employs a universal controller that can manage multiple types of laboratory equipment and test different parameters through a single integrated platform, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining verification completeness
3Reliability
If detailed documentation and reporting of all test parameters is implemented, then traceability and compliance are improved, but data processing time and storage requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system automatically captures and logs all test data during execution with proper metadata and timestamps, preparing compliance documentation in advance rather than generating reports after testing completes, thereby reducing post-test processing time
Data Source
AI summary
A system and approach for verifying and validating a room condition and its behavior in a critical environment. The system and approach may be a room controller built on top of a Niagara™ framework or launched from a Niagara workbench, and leverages extensible of Niagara. The system and approach may be web-based and used to test and verify the room condition per preset conditions. The system may have steps or tabs. They may incorporate screens for a create/open task, select test zone, read flow, hood/booster, T-stat set-up or temperature lever set-up, visual checks, and a report. One may create a new task and edit any existing task on the controller. One may move from task to task in either direction or go directly to the report of a completed task.