Ladder Tray Locking Mechanism Single-Handed Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ladder tray locking mechanisms are cumbersome, requiring two hands to operate and can cause pinching, while also being space inefficient and not providing adequate rigidity, especially when in the open position.

Innovation Solution

A locking mechanism with dual sliding rods biased by springs for single-handed operation, eliminating the need for hinges and links, and incorporating metal strike plates for alignment and wear protection, with locking pins positioned above the pivot to enhance strength and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If links are used to provide locking and support for the tray, then the tray can be locked in the use position, but two hands are required to release the lock mechanism and there is potential for pinching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking reliabilityVSAvoidoperation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the links from the mechanism entirely, extracting the problematic component that required two-handed operation and created pinching hazards. The locking function is achieved through a different mechanism using sliding rods and cam-actuated locking pins that can be operated with one hand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the link-based mechanical system with a sliding rod and cam-actuated locking pin system. This substitution eliminates the need for two-handed operation while maintaining reliable locking, as the new mechanism uses cam surfaces to amplify the locking action during a single-handed squeezing motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Strength

If links are used for locking mechanism, then the tray can be supported, but the mechanism takes up space beneath the tray

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray support strengthVSAvoidspace occupation
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the links from the system entirely, eliminating the space they occupied beneath the tray. The support function is redistributed to the tray's structural ribs and the compact locking mechanism integrated into the handle assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves the locking mechanism from a horizontal arrangement (links extending beneath the tray) to a vertical arrangement (locking pins moving vertically within the handle assembly). This dimensional change eliminates space occupation beneath the tray while maintaining locking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If traditional locking mechanism is used, then the tray can be attached to the ladder, but the operation is cumbersome and requires two hands

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment securityVSAvoidoperation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-latching mechanism where the cam surfaces automatically engage the locking pins when the sliding rods are squeezed together. The springs provide automatic return to the locked position, making the system self-servicing and eliminating the need for two-handed manual manipulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameter from requiring two separate hand movements to a single squeezing motion. The force applied by one hand simultaneously actuates both sliding rods, which through cam surfaces amplify this force into secure locking of both sides of the tray.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If hinges are used to attach the tray, then the tray can be pivotally mounted, but the structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray positioning flexibilityVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes hinges from the mechanism entirely, extracting the source of structural complexity. The pivotal mounting function is replaced by a direct attachment system using the sliding rods and locking pins that secure the tray to the handle without requiring rotational joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a secure, rigid, and easy-to-operate ladder tray locking mechanism that reduces space usage and eliminates the need for separate storage and handling of the tray, enhancing user convenience and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

springs to bias the locking pins in the locked position and the stored position of the tray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11655676B2Ladder tray locking mechanism
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 TRICAM IND LLC
  • US11655676B2 patent drawing
  • US11655676B2 patent drawing
  • US11655676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A locking mechanism for a ladder tray is disclosed. The locking mechanism includes two locking points on the frame or handle of the ladder while allowing single-handed operation.