Lambda Control Reactivation for Catalytic Converter Emission Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control methods for three-way catalytic converters in internal combustion engines often recognize deviations from the optimal operating point too late, leading to inefficient emission control due to imprecise lambda sensor readings and model-based control inaccuracies, which can result in worsened emission behavior.

Innovation Solution

A method that deactivates and reactivates lambda control by determining the current and future exhaust gas compositions, adjusting the air-fuel mixture based on the catalytic converter's oxygen fill level, and using lambda sensors to correct potential errors, thereby preventing misjudgments and maintaining optimal emission control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of stationary object

If lambda control is deactivated during inactive control phases, then the catalytic converter can operate without continuous intervention, but the control system cannot respond timely when reactivation is needed, leading to late recognition of deviations from the catalytic converter window

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduration of inactive control phaseVSAvoidresponse time upon reactivation
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring exhaust gas composition and modeling the oxygen fill level of the catalytic converter even during inactive control phases. This allows the system to be ready for immediate effective control upon reactivation, eliminating the delay in recognizing deviations from the catalytic converter window.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If model-based control is used to estimate oxygen fill level, then continuous control is possible, but imprecise model assumptions lead to errors in planned control interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of controlVSAvoidprecision of oxygen fill level determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from exhaust gas composition measurements both upstream and downstream of the catalytic converter to continuously validate and correct the modeled oxygen fill level. This feedback mechanism allows for real-time correction of imprecise model assumptions, ensuring accurate determination of the oxygen fill level even during inactive control phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If lambda control is reactivated without correction of previous errors, then control can be restored quickly, but misjudgments of the oxygen fill level result in worsened emission behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of control reactivationVSAvoidaccuracy of emission control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary correction of control errors by continuously monitoring exhaust gas composition and adjusting the modeled oxygen fill level before reactivation. This preliminary action ensures that when lambda control is reactivated, the system already has accurate information about the current state, allowing for immediate correct control interventions without worsening emission behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for timely reinitialization of the lambda control, reducing the likelihood of misjudgments and maintaining effective emission control, even during inactive control phases, thereby preventing increased NOx, CO, and HC emissions.

Implementation Method 1

The mentioned pollutant components can be converted by using a three-way catalytic converter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

the oxygen content of the exhaust gas before the catalytic converter is measured using a lambda sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrochemical measurement:

Data Source

PatentUS11933239B2Method, processing unit, and computer program for operating an internal combustion engine having at least one catalytic converter
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11933239B2 patent drawing
  • US11933239B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is directed to operating an internal combustion engine having at least one catalytic converter, wherein control interventions of a lambda control for controlling an exhaust gas composition of the engine are deactivated. The method includes the steps of ascertaining a current exhaust gas composition upstream of the catalytic converter, determining a current oxygen fill level of the catalytic converter on the basis of the ascertained current exhaust gas composition, ascertaining a planned control intervention on a composition of an air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine on the basis of the determined current oxygen fill level of the catalytic converter, ascertaining a current exhaust gas composition downstream of the catalytic converter, ascertaining a future exhaust gas composition downstream of the catalytic converter resulting on the basis of an air-fuel mixture already supplied to the engine, and reactivating the lambda control and specifying a control intervention to be carried out.