Laminated Glass Cutting System with Parallel Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for cutting laminated glass panels into individual panes are inefficient and costly, lacking a systematic approach for effective and automated division.

Innovation Solution

A laminated glass cutting system with a multi-level layout featuring edge decoating, cutting, and transport devices that allow for precise scoring, breaking, and separation of glass panels, utilizing a combination of cutting bridges, positioning bridges, and conveyor sections to manage and process glass panels efficiently, enabling simultaneous cutting and storage of multiple panels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single cutting device is used for all cutting operations, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to sequential processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting device structureVSAvoidcutting throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting device is divided into multiple independent cutting units (first cutting unit and second cutting unit) that can operate simultaneously. The first cutting unit processes panels in a first cutting direction while the second cutting unit processes panels in a second cutting direction, enabling parallel processing and increasing productivity without requiring a single complex multi-functional device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces a temporal dimension to the cutting process by implementing multiple cutting units that operate at different times or simultaneously on different panels. The control unit coordinates these units to process multiple laminated glass panels through different cutting directions, effectively adding a time-based dimension to the cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If multiple cutting units are used simultaneously, then productivity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting throughputVSAvoidcutting device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each cutting unit is designed as a universal module that can perform multiple cutting operations. The first cutting unit and second cutting unit are structurally similar and can both score, break, and separate panels, allowing them to be used interchangeably for different cutting directions and panel sizes, thereby reducing overall system complexity despite having multiple units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically coordinates multiple cutting units through a control unit that manages their operation sequences. The cutting units can be activated independently or simultaneously based on the cutting plan, allowing flexible adaptation to different panel configurations and cutting requirements without requiring permanent complex interconnections between all units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a fixed cutting sequence is used, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability decreases for different panel configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol systemVSAvoidcutting plan flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives input data about the required laminated glass panes and automatically generates an optimized cutting plan. This feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt to different panel configurations, sizes, and quantities by processing the input data and creating appropriate cutting sequences, eliminating the need for manual reconfiguration while maintaining high adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as cutting direction, cutting speed, and unit activation sequences based on the cutting plan. The control unit adjusts these parameters dynamically to optimize the cutting process for different panel configurations, allowing the same hardware to efficiently handle diverse cutting requirements without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If sequential cutting operations are used, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting processVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous productive action by operating multiple cutting units simultaneously on different panels. While one cutting unit is processing a panel, another cutting unit can be processing a different panel or preparing for the next operation, eliminating idle time between sequential operations and ensuring that the cutting process continues without interruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit prepares and coordinates cutting operations in advance by generating cutting plans that optimize the sequence and timing of multiple cutting units. Panels are positioned and prepared before cutting begins, and the cutting units are activated in an optimized sequence that minimizes waiting time and maximizes continuous processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3867203B1Laminated glass cutting system and method for cutting laminated glass panels
Publication Date: 2023.04.12 HEGLA GMBH & CO KG
  • EP3867203B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3867203B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3867203B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a laminated glass cutting system (1) for dividing laminated glass panels (14), preferably laminated safety glass panels, which have at least two glass sheets and a laminated glass intermediate film arranged therebetween, into laminated glass panes (13), preferably laminated safety glass panes, the system having an edge coating removal device (5), a laminated glass cutting device (7) for separating a laminated glass panel part (14b; 14c) from the laminated glass panel (14; 14a) and/or from a separated laminated glass panel part (14b-d), and a recirculation device (24) for recirculating a separated laminated glass panel part (14b; 14c) to the laminated glass cutting device (7), wherein the recirculation device (24) has a pivot device (10) for pivoting the separated laminated glass panel part (14b; 14c) about a vertical pivot axis. The invention further relates to a laminated glass cutting method, preferably using a laminated glass cutting system of this kind.