Laminated Vehicle Glazing With Stiff Interlayer for Torque Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laminated vehicle glazings, particularly windshields, face challenges in maintaining mechanical robustness and strength while reducing weight, especially in out-of-plane torque tests, due to the use of thinner glass sheets without chemical strengthening, which can lead to interfacial peeling and breakage at attachments.

Innovation Solution

A laminated vehicle glazing design with a polymer interlayer featuring a major part and a stiff part adjacent to the major part, where the stiff part has a higher Young's modulus than the major part, providing enhanced adhesion and stiffness to support attachments like rear-view mirrors, thereby improving mechanical robustness and strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If thinner glass sheets are used to reduce weight, then weight is reduced, but mechanical robustness and strength deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of laminated glazingVSAvoidmechanical robustness and strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The interlayer is designed with different stiffness in different regions: a first region with lower stiffness and a second region with higher stiffness. This local differentiation allows the glazing to be lightweight overall while providing localized strength where attachments are mounted, resolving the contradiction between weight reduction and mechanical robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The interlayer comprises a composite structure with a first interlayer material (softer) and a second interlayer material (stiffer). This composite approach enables the glazing to achieve both weight reduction through thinner glass and maintained strength through the stiff second region that prevents interfacial peeling at attachments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Strength

If chemical strengthening is applied to thinner glass sheets, then mechanical robustness is improved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical robustness of thinner glassVSAvoidmanufacturing processes
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the strengthening function from the glass itself and relocates it to the interlayer's second region. Instead of chemically strengthening the glass (which adds manufacturing complexity), the stiffer second interlayer material provides the necessary strength support, simplifying the manufacturing process while maintaining mechanical robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The second region of the interlayer acts as an intermediary that provides mechanical support to thinner glass sheets without requiring chemical strengthening of the glass. This intermediary layer transfers and distributes stresses, enabling the use of simpler, non-chemically strengthened glass while maintaining overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of manufacture

If uniform interlayer material is used, then manufacturing is simplified, but local strength at attachments is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterlayer manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidstrength at attachment areas
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The interlayer transitions from a uniform structure to a non-uniform structure with a first region and a second region having different stiffness characteristics. This local quality differentiation provides enhanced strength at attachment areas (second region) while maintaining overall manufacturing feasibility through established lamination processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The interlayer is segmented into functionally distinct regions: a first region for general bonding and a second region for localized strength support at attachments. This segmentation allows each region to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining compatibility with standard manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively distributes torque forces across a larger area, enhancing the glazing's ability to withstand out-of-plane torque without breakage, while maintaining adhesion to the glass sheets, thus meeting regulatory standards and daily application requirements.

Implementation Method 1

the stiff part comprises at least one layer of a second interlayer material, wherein the stiff part is adhered to the first and second glass sheets and to the major part, and the second interlayer material has a higher Young's modulus than the first interlayer material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

the stiff part is adhered to the first and second glass sheets and to the major part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentEP3787894B1Laminated vehicle glazing having a stiff interlayer
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 CENT GLASS CO LTD
  • EP3787894B1 patent drawingFigure 1(a)
  • EP3787894B1 patent drawingFigure 1(b)
  • EP3787894B1 patent drawingFigure 1(c)

AI summary

Disclosed generally herein is a laminated vehicle glazing including first and second glass sheets and a polymer interlayer interposed therebetween. The interlayer includes a major part and a stiff part adjacent to the major part. The stiff part does not surround the major part, such that the major part is along at least one edge of the laminated vehicle glazing. The stiff part includes at least one layer made of a material that has a higher Young's modulus than that of the material used in the major part. Young's modulus in the thickness direction of the stiff part is higher than that of the major part.