Laminated Robotic Actuators for Constrained Space Navigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robots with rigid structures face limitations in mobility and versatility, particularly in navigating constrained spaces and mimicking the movement of soft-bodied organisms, due to material and actuation constraints.

Innovation Solution

The development of laminated robotic actuators comprising a strain-limiting layer and a flexible inflatable layer, with a pressurizable channel and fluid inlet, allowing for various motions such as bending, twisting, and gripping, and capable of being fabricated using inexpensive materials and processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If rigid structures are used in robots, then structural strength and stability are improved, but mobility and ability to navigate constrained spaces deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmobility and ability to navigate constrained spaces
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible thin films as the primary structural material, replacing traditional rigid components. The robotic actuator is constructed from laminated flexible layers that can bend, twist, and deform to navigate constrained spaces while maintaining structural integrity through the laminated architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material structures, specifically laminated flexible layers with different mechanical properties. The combination of multiple flexible material layers creates a composite structure that provides both the necessary flexibility for mobility and sufficient strength for structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Adaptability or versatility

If soft materials are used for robotic actuators, then adaptability and mobility are improved, but structural strength and load-bearing capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemobility and adaptabilityVSAvoidstructural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material structures, specifically laminated flexible layers with different mechanical properties. The combination of multiple flexible material layers creates a composite structure that provides both the necessary flexibility for mobility and sufficient strength for structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the robotic actuator into multiple segmented flexible layers that can be independently controlled. This segmentation allows different regions to exhibit different mechanical behaviors, with some layers providing flexibility for adaptation while others maintain structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Force

If pneumatic actuators are used, then force generation and actuation capability are improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuation forceVSAvoidactuator complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses flexible thin films to create simple pneumatic chambers without requiring complex rigid housings or seals. The flexible layers themselves form the pneumatic actuator chambers, eliminating the need for traditional complex pneumatic component assemblies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the structural body with the pneumatic actuator chambers by using the flexible laminated layers to serve both structural and actuation functions. This integration eliminates separate components and simplifies the overall device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If thin flexible structures are used, then ability to operate in narrow spaces is improved, but manufacturing precision and quality control become more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to operate in narrow spacesVSAvoidfabrication precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs flexible thin films as the primary structural material, replacing traditional rigid components. The robotic actuator is constructed from laminated flexible layers that can bend, twist, and deform to navigate constrained spaces while maintaining structural integrity through the laminated architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite material structures, specifically laminated flexible layers with different mechanical properties. The combination of multiple flexible material layers creates a composite structure that provides both the necessary flexibility for mobility and sufficient strength for structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These actuators provide enhanced mobility, stability, and versatility, enabling robots to operate in narrow spaces and perform complex tasks like delicate surgical procedures, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and improving aerodynamic structures.

Implementation Method 1

a portion of an un-adhered region between the strain-limiting layer and the flexible inflatable layer defines a pressurizable channel

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatics: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

a strain-limiting layer comprising a flexible, non-extensible material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS10233910B2Flexible thin robotic actuators
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 PRESIDENT & FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
  • US10233910B2 patent drawing
  • US10233910B2 patent drawing
  • US10233910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Some embodiments of the disclosed subject matter includes a laminated robotic actuator. The laminated robotic actuator includes a strain-limiting layer comprising a flexible, non-extensible material in the form of a sheet or thin film, a flexible inflatable layer in the form of a thin film or sheet in facing relationship with the strain-limiting layer, wherein the inflatable layer is selectively adhered to the strain-limiting layer, and wherein a portion of an un-adhered region between the strain-limiting layer and the inflatable layer defines a pressurizable channel, and at least one fluid inlet in fluid communication with the pressurizable channel. The first flexible non-extensible material has a stiffness that is greater than the stiffness of the second flexible elastomeric material and the flexible elastomer is non-extensible under actuation conditions.