Lancet Coupling Features and Sterility Cap Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lancets often face issues with ease of insertion and ejection, alignment, and sterility maintenance, leading to potential pain and misalignment during use, as well as challenges in disposal and handling due to their design.

Innovation Solution

The lancet design incorporates cantilevered fingers, flexible arches, or resilient coupling members for improved alignment and ejection, along with a sterility cap featuring a handle for easier removal and replacement, ensuring proper engagement with lancing devices and enhancing user safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional lancet designs are used, then manufacturing is simple, but insertion and ejection are difficult and misalignment occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of insertion and ejectionVSAvoidlancet structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lancet is divided into distinct functional segments: a shaft portion with coupling members for engagement, a tip portion for lancing, and a handle portion for manipulation. This segmentation allows each part to be optimized for its specific function while maintaining overall simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The coupling members are designed as resilient or flexible elements that can dynamically adapt during insertion and ejection. These members flex during engagement and then snap into place, providing easy insertion while maintaining secure connection. The dynamic nature of these coupling members enables simple ejection through reverse flexing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If traditional lancet designs are used, then structure is simple, but alignment during use is poor causing pain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment reliabilityVSAvoidcoupling mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling members are positioned asymmetrically on the lancet shaft, with specific geometric configurations that guide proper alignment during insertion. This asymmetric design ensures the lancet engages correctly with the lancing device, preventing misalignment and associated pain while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The resilient coupling members provide tactile feedback during insertion, allowing the user to sense when proper engagement has occurred. This feedback mechanism ensures reliable alignment without requiring complex alignment indicators or mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If traditional lancet designs are used, then sterility is maintained, but handling and disposal are challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of handling and disposalVSAvoidsterility cap design complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sterility cap is merged with the lancet handle to form an integrated assembly. The cap serves dual functions: maintaining sterility of the tip and providing a gripping surface for safe handling and disposal. This merging eliminates the need for separate cap and handle components, simplifying the overall structure while improving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Productivity

If resilient coupling members are added, then insertion and ejection improve, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion and ejection efficiencyVSAvoidlancet manufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The coupling members are designed with specific material properties and geometric parameters that enable resilient behavior. By carefully selecting material elasticity and cross-sectional dimensions, the members provide easy insertion and ejection while remaining compatible with standard manufacturing processes. The parameters are optimized to balance performance with manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The improved design facilitates smoother insertion and removal, reduces pain by maintaining axial alignment, and simplifies lancet handling and disposal, providing tactile feedback and ensuring sterility through positive engagement mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

at least one resilient coupling member for releasable engagement with a cooperating coupling member of a lancing device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS8840635B2Lancets with improved coupling features and sterility caps
Publication Date: 2014.09.23 FACET TECH LLC
  • US8840635B2 patent drawing
  • US8840635B2 patent drawing
  • US8840635B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Improved lancet configurations and protective lancet endcap configurations are disclosed. In example forms, one or more flexing cantilevers project from the lancet body for coupling with a cooperating receiver of a lancing device. A gripping handle extends from a sterility cap for ease of removal from and replacement over the lancet tip. A lancet body has a smoothly curved wave contour with at least one crest and at least one trough for engagement with a cooperating receiver of a lancing device.