Land Parcel Mapping Using Photogrammetry Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for mapping land parcels are labor-intensive and inaccurate, especially for large areas, as they rely on human measurements, which can be time-consuming and prone to errors, hindering precise identification of sub-area ownership and development planning.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing photogrammetry data processing to correct errors in geometric parcel data by computing real-world distances, identifying intersecting subareas, and removing redundant vertices, ensuring accurate boundary definitions and reducing errors in land parcel mapping.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human beings are sent to map land parcels using measuring equipment, then the mapping process can be performed manually, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive for large areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping accuracyVSAvoidmapping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical measurement processes with automated photogrammetry-based computer processing. Instead of human beings physically measuring land parcels with equipment, the system uses aerial photographs and computer algorithms to automatically generate accurate boundary definitions, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual fieldwork while maintaining or improving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates accurate copies of land parcel boundaries through photogrammetry - generating digital representations from aerial photographs. This copying process allows multiple analyses and verifications to be performed on the digital model without requiring repeated physical field measurements, significantly reducing time loss while maintaining mapping accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of manufacture

If manual measurement processes are used for land parcel mapping, then the process can be completed with simple equipment, but the measurements become prone to human errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual measurement operations with automated computer-based photogrammetric processing. The system objectively calculates boundary positions from aerial photographs using algorithms, eliminating human measurement errors while maintaining process accessibility through standardized automated workflows that are equally easy to implement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates verification mechanisms that provide feedback on measurement consistency. The system checks whether calculated boundary positions meet accuracy criteria and can identify and correct errors, thereby improving reliability while maintaining ease of use through automated quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If photogrammetry data is used to define land parcel boundaries, then the boundary definitions become more accurate, but the data processing becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary definition accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual boundary definition processes with automated photogrammetry-based computer processing. While the underlying photogrammetric algorithms are sophisticated, they are implemented as standardized software processes that automatically handle the complexity, delivering high boundary definition accuracy without requiring users to manually manage the computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to automatically perform verification and correction of boundary definitions without requiring external intervention. The automated process independently handles data processing, error detection, and correction, thereby managing complexity internally while delivering accurate results to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Stability of the object's composition

If vertices are kept in the initial representation, then the polygon definition is complete, but redundant vertices increase data size and processing complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolygon definition completenessVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes redundant vertices from the polygon vertex lists while preserving the essential boundary definition. The system identifies collinear or duplicate vertices that do not contribute to the actual boundary shape and eliminates them, thereby reducing data volume and processing requirements while maintaining complete and accurate polygon definitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11836975B1System and method for mapping land parcels using computer processes and images of the land parcels
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 GEO DATA AG
  • US11836975B1 patent drawing
  • US11836975B1 patent drawing
  • US11836975B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processing photogrammetry data that represents parcels by computing a real-world distance between a first location representing a location of a specific separation point of a specific subarea included in the area as appearing in the initial representation and a second location that represents a location of the same specific separation point as appearing in the photogrammetry data, defining a specific separation point as identifying incorrect if the real-world distance exceeds a reference distance dictated by accuracy level, intersecting subareas of the subarea to which the examined vertex belongs, measuring a distance between the examined vertex and a closest point in the intersecting subarea, marking the examined vertex as an error if the intersecting distance exceeds a threshold, computing angles for edges defining subarea boundaries, and removing a vertex between two subsequent edges having an angle between them that satisfies a condition representing that the subsequent edges constitute a single line.