Land Plane Ripper Teeth Mechanical Latching System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing land plane attachments with ripper teeth require manual or hydraulic operation, causing operator inconvenience, safety risks, and inefficiencies, as they need to be manually or hydraulically manipulated, leading to time and cost wastage.

Innovation Solution

A land plane attachment with deployable and retractable ripper teeth that can be operated without auxiliary hydraulics, allowing the operator to engage and disengage the teeth from within the cab, featuring a mechanical set and reset system that automatically positions the teeth for forward ripping and backward leveling, enhancing operational efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual or hydraulic operation of ripper teeth is used, then the teeth can be deployed and retracted, but operator convenience deteriorates and safety risks increase due to the need to leave the cab or use auxiliary hydraulics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveripper teeth operationVSAvoidtime to deploy/retract teeth
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the skid steer loader's own hydraulic system that is already available at the base, eliminating the need for auxiliary hydraulic connections. The existing hydraulic lines and pump are utilized to power the ripper tooth deployment, making the system self-sufficient without additional external resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The land plane attachment integrates multiple functions: it serves as both a grading tool and a ripping tool. The ripper teeth can be deployed to loosen compacted soil before grading operations, eliminating the need to switch between separate implements and allowing one attachment to handle multiple soil preparation tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual operation of ripper teeth is used, then the teeth can be positioned, but operator safety deteriorates due to exposure to worksite conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveripper teeth controlVSAvoidoperator safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical operation of ripper teeth is replaced with a hydraulic actuation system. The hydraulic cylinders provide automated force to deploy and retract the heavy ripper teeth, replacing manual lever manipulation with fluid-powered actuation that is both easier to control and safer for the operator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Hydraulic fluid acts as an intermediary between the operator's control inputs and the ripper teeth. The operator controls valve spools that direct hydraulic fluid to cylinders, which then move the teeth. This intermediary system allows precise control without direct mechanical connection, improving both ease of operation and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If auxiliary hydraulic connection is used for ripper teeth, then hydraulic actuation is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic actuation of teethVSAvoidhydraulic system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex auxiliary hydraulic connection system is extracted and replaced by utilizing the existing hydraulic system at the base of the skid steer loader. By taking out the need for external hydraulic lines and connections, the system achieves automated hydraulic actuation while minimizing additional complexity. Only the essential components (cylinders, valves, reservoir) are added.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Device complexity

If hydraulic system at base is utilized, then auxiliary hydraulic connection is eliminated, but use of energy increases due to continuous hydraulic engagement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic connection systemVSAvoidhydraulic energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hydraulic system is designed to operate periodically rather than continuously. Hydraulic fluid is directed to the cylinders only when teeth deployment or retraction is required, then the system returns to a neutral state. This periodic operation minimizes energy consumption while maintaining the capability for rapid deployment when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12180674B2Land plane attachment with mechanical ripper
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 STEPHAN MICHAEL F
  • US12180674B2 patent drawing
  • US12180674B2 patent drawing
  • US12180674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A land plane with a ripper, including a plane portion including at least two cutter bars and a ripper mechanism having a ripper bar assembly having ripper teeth that are shiftable between a downwardly extended orientation in which the ripper teeth are biased to extend downwardly beyond the at least two cutter bars thereby facilitating ground engaging contact of the ripper teeth and a retracted orientation in which the ripper teeth are above the at least two cutter bars. The ripper mechanism further includes a latching mechanism and a reset bar extending outwardly away from the plane portion and coupled to the latching mechanism. The reset bar is shiftable between a first position wherein the ripper teeth are secured in the retracted orientation by the latching mechanism and a second position wherein the ripper teeth are biased toward the extended position by the latching mechanism.