Computer Land Planning System Heuristic Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current land planning process is time-consuming, inaccurate, and expensive due to complex bureaucratic complications, environmental protection requirements, and high land costs, often resulting in unoptimized development designs and significant investment risks for real estate developers and government entities.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented land planning system utilizing heuristic mathematical optimization approaches, such as evolutionary algorithms, to generate multiple optimized land development solutions within a 24-hour period, integrating engineering, budgeting, and aesthetic considerations, and providing cost-effective options through web-accessible technology.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual land planning processes are used with architects and engineers, then design quality and expertise are maintained, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming (4 weeks to 28 weeks) and expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign qualityVSAvoidplanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of land planning (architects and engineers physically creating designs) with an automated computer-based system that uses mathematical optimization algorithms and heuristics to generate multiple design alternatives, thereby eliminating the time-consuming manual iteration while maintaining design quality through systematic evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service land planning by allowing developers to input their own parameters and constraints, then automatically generating multiple optimized design alternatives without requiring engagement of external architects and engineers for the initial planning phases, significantly reducing both time and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple design alternatives are generated manually, then more options are available for optimization, but the cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of design optionsVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal computer-based system that can handle multiple design alternatives simultaneously by integrating various functions (constraint validation, cost calculation, optimization algorithms) into a single multi-functional platform, allowing generation of numerous design options without proportionally increasing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters from manual fixed designs to computationally variable parameters that can be systematically adjusted through optimization algorithms, allowing rapid generation of multiple design alternatives by varying input parameters such as building footprints, site utilization, and cost constraints

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If detailed engineering assessment is performed early in the process, then investment risks are reduced, but substantial investment in legal fees and earnest money is required to hold the property

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinvestment securityVSAvoidinitial investment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary engineering assessments and generates multiple optimized design alternatives with cost estimates before the property purchase is finalized, allowing developers to evaluate investment risks and potential returns in advance, thereby reducing the need for large earnest money deposits and legal fees to hold the property

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If a single un-optimized design option is used for budget estimation, then the planning process is simpler, but the budget accuracy is reduced and value engineering is required later

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning simplicityVSAvoidbudget accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where each generated design alternative is automatically evaluated against multiple criteria including cost estimates, constraint satisfaction, and optimization objectives, providing continuous feedback that improves budget accuracy while maintaining planning simplicity through automated iterative refinement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10380270B2Computer-implemented land planning system and method
Publication Date: 2019.08.13 BENTLEY SYSTEMS INC
  • US10380270B2 patent drawing
  • US10380270B2 patent drawing
  • US10380270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented land planning system is designed to generate at least one conceptual fit solution to a user-defined land development problem. The system electronically creates at least one candidate solution to the land development problem. The candidate solution incorporates a number of engineering measurements applicable in development of an undeveloped land site. A fitness function quantitatively evaluates the candidate solution based on its fitness. A heuristic problem-solving strategy manipulates the engineering measurements of the candidate solution to achieve a more quantitatively fit solution to the land development problem. A computer output device outputs to a user documentation illustrating the fit solution to the land development problem.